Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38322635›Full record

ArticleJournal of human reproductive sciences

The Use of Fluorescence

Heba Mohamed Ossama, Soha Kholeif, Ghada Mohamed Elhady

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human reproductive sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Heba Mohamed OssamaDepartment of Human Genetics, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Soha KholeifDepartment of Human Genetics, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Ghada Mohamed ElhadyDepartment of Human Genetics, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Turner syndrome (TS) is the most common chromosomal abnormality in females. The diagnosis of TS is based on karyotyping of 30 blood lymphocytes. This technique does not rule out tissue mosaicism or low-grade mosaicism in the blood. Because of the associated risk of gonadoblastoma, mosaicism is especially important in case this involves a Y chromosome. Aims: This study was set to determine the value of additional genetic studies such as fluorescent Settings and Design: This cross-sectional, descriptive study was performed in Human Genetics Department, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University. Materials and Methods: Fluorescence Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive study where categorical variables were described using number and percentage and continuous variables were described using mean and standard deviation. Results: Fluorescence Conclusions: Molecular cytogenetic investigation for all suspected cases of TS should be considered for appropriate treatment plan and genetic counselling.

Indexed as

Fluorescent in situ hybridisationmosaicismturner syndrome

Identifiers

PMID38322635
PMCPMC10841934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.