ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024
Mapping the epitope of PD-L1 to the paratope of the antibody durvalumab using molecular dynamics simulation.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesDurvalumab, a human monoclonal antibody that stops PD-L1 from attaching itself to CD80 and PD-1, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in cancer therapy. An essential stage in antibody optimization is mapping paratope residues to epitope residues. In this study, our earlier computer-aided method based on molecular dynamics (MD) simulations was used to observe the paratope residues on durvalumab and their companions on PD-L1.
methodsThe durvalumab/PD-L1 complex model was obtained from the Protein Data Bank and used in a rectangular box for solvation. On durvalumab, the paratope residues and their companions on PD-L1 were identified using MD simulations. The interface residues were ranked on the basis of their contributions to the binding of durvalumab and PD-L1 by assessing the stability of hydrogen bonds and salt bridges. This assessment was conducted using free and guided MD simulations.
resultsSeventeen residues, including ASP26, GLU58, GLU60, ASP61, ARG113, ARG125, and THR127 on PD-L1 and H31ARG, H52LYS, H53GLN, H57GLU, H99GLU, H103PHE, H113ARG, L28ARG, L31SER, and L92TYR on durvalumab, were expected to be necessary for the binding of durvalumab to PD-L1. ASP26, ARG113, and ARG125 on PD-L1 were essential for its binding to PD-1. Eight residues (GLU60, ASP61, and THR127 on PD-L1 and L31SER, H99GLU, H53GLU, H31ARG, and H113ARG on durvalumab) were newly found, and two residues (LYS124 on PD-L1 and L94SER on durvalumab) proven nonessential for complexation, compared to the findings from the examined crystal structure.
conclusionsThe antithrombotic antibody of durvalumab's paratope may be effectively mapped to the PD-L1 epitope using the existing computer method. This information will help optimize durvalumab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38322578PMC10839400W4394761008What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.