ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024
Compressed sensing magnetic resonance imaging (CS-MRI) diagnosis of rotator cuff tears.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of large language models in patient education and clinical decision support for rotator cuff injury: a two-phase benchmarking study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Comparison of the Effects of Ultrasound-Guided Subacromial Injection Versus Subacromial Injection and Suprascapular Nerve Block on Pain, Function, and Sleep Quality in Rotator Cuff Lesions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Coefficient-Shuffled Variable Block Compressed Sensing for Medical Image Compression in Telemedicine Systems.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe present prospective study was performed to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of compressed sensing magnetic resonance imaging (CS-MRI) for rotator cuff tears.
methodsBetween December 1, 2021 and April 1, 2022, 62 patients with suspected rotator cuff tears were admitted to Affiliated Hospital of Jinggangshan University and received CS-MRI and arthroscopy to determine the diagnosis and the disease type of tears. Their medical data were obtained and analyzed to evaluate the clinical feasibility of CS-MRI in diagnosing rotator cuff tears.
resultsOf the 62 cases of suspected rotator cuff tears, 45 were confirmed by arthroscopy, including 31 cases of total tears and 14 partial tears. Using arthroscopic findings as the gold standard for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears, the sensitivity of clinical signs to diagnose rotator cuff tears was 66.67%, the specificity was 70.59%, and the accuracy was 67.74%, while the sensitivity of CS-MRI in diagnosing rotator cuff tears was 84.44%, the specificity was 88.24%, and the accuracy was 81.54%. The accuracy of CS-MRI was significantly higher than that of clinical signs as determined by chi-square test within groups (P=0.019).
conclusionCS-MRI provides high resolution for muscles, tendons, and soft tissues, significantly contributing to the diagnosis of soft tissue injuries. Although there were no significant differences in the sensitivity and specificity of CS-MRI for the clinical diagnosis of rotator cuff tears compared to the clinical signs, CS-MRI significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38322573PMC10839380What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.