ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024
Effects of "Timing It Right" nursing on clinical outcome and psychological resilience for lung cancer patients undergoing radical thoracoscopic surgery.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Timing it Right Brain Tumor Support Program (TIRBTSP) on clinical outcome for patients diagnosed with sellar region tumors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Experiences and Needs of Patients with Esophageal Cancer Receiving Esophagectomy: A Qualitative Longitudinal Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo investigate the effects of "Timing It Right (TIR)" nursing on clinical outcome and psychological resilience in lung cancer patients undergoing radical thoracoscopic surgery.
methodsIn this retrospective study, 60 patients from January 2022 to June 2023 were studied. Among them, observation group received TIR intervention (n = 34), while control group received routine nursing intervention (n = 26). The self-care ability, psychological resilience, quality of life (QoL), postoperative recovery, postoperative complications, and postoperative pulmonary function recovery were compared between the two groups.
resultsThe scores of ESCA (Exercise of Self-Care Agency) and CD-RISC (Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale), lung function, and QoL-C30 in observation group were significantly higher than those in control group after discharge, while the incidence of postoperative complications in observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (all P<0.05). Furthermore, time to first bedtime activity and chest drain removal, and the length of postoperative hospitalization in the observation group were obviously shorter than those in the control group (all P<0.05).
conclusionTIR nursing can effectively enhance the self-care ability of lung cancer patients undergoing radical thoracoscopic surgery, improve their psychological elasticity, enhance their quality of life, shorten the hospitalization time, and reduce the incidence of adverse reactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38322558PMC10839382W4394739814What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.