ArticleSichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition2024
[Distribution and Antibiotic Resistance Analysis of Ocular Bacterial Pathogens at a Tertiary Hospital From 2012 to 2021].
Article in Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acute Post-cataract Surgery Endophthalmitis and Corneal Ulcer withJournal of research in pharmacy practice · 2026Article
- From pathogen to prognosis: microbial keratitis spectrum and treatment outcomes in a 5-Year tertiary center experience.Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the distribution of ocular bacterial pathogens and their antibiotic resistance status at a tertiary-care hospital and to provide a reference for the appropriate use of antibiotics. Methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted with bacteria isolated from the ophthalmic samples sent for lab analysis at a tertiary-care hospital from 2012 to 2021. The suspected bacterial strains were identified with automated systems for microbial identification and susceptibility analysis and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer. VITEK 2 Compact, an automated microbial identification and antibiotic susceptibility analysis system, was used for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Results: A total of 1556 ophthalmology bacteria culture samples were collected, 574 of which showed bacterial growth, presenting an overall positive rate of 36.89%. Of the isolated bacteria, Gram-positive cocci, Gram-positive bacilli, Gram-negative bacilli, and Gram-negative cocci accounted for 63.15% (377/597), 18.76% (112/597), 17.09% (102/597), and 1.00% (6/597), respectively. Among the bacteria isolated in different years over the course of a decade, Gram-positive cocci always turned out to be the main cause of eye infections. Of the Gram-positive cocci, 73.47% (277/377) were isolated from patients with endophthalmitis, with the most important species being Conclusion: The chief ocular bacterial pathogens identified in a tertiary-care hospital were Gram-positive cocci, among which,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.