ArticleBJA open2024
Training in regional anaesthesia: there is much to do.
Article in BJA open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This editorial discusses a survey of anaesthesia trainees and trainers from the UK concerning training in regional anaesthesia. The study found a large disparity in the number and diversity of regional anaesthesia procedures carried out by trainees during their initial training and that the presence of a departmental regional anaesthesia training lead improves the quality of teaching of these techniques. This study emphasises the fact that there is still a huge effort required to provide adequate training in regional anaesthetic techniques in the UK if patients are to benefit from the optimal postoperative analgesia they provide: the same probably applies also in many other European countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.