Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38322414›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Stromal area differences with epithelial-mesenchymal transition gene changes in conjunctival and orbital mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma.

Mizuki Tagami, Hiroaki Kasashima, Anna Kakehashi, Atsuko Yoshikawa, Mizuho Nishio, Norihiko Misawa, Atsushi Sakai, Hideki Wanibuchi, Masakazu Yashiro, Atsushi Azumi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Artificial intelligence-based differential diagnosis of orbital MALT lymphoma and IgG4 related ophthalmic disease using hematoxylin-eosin images.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mizuki TagamiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroaki KasashimaMolecular Oncology and Therapeutics, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Anna KakehashiDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.
Atsuko YoshikawaOphthalmology Department and Eye Center, Kobe Kaisei Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Mizuho NishioDepartment of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Norihiko MisawaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.
Atsushi SakaiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.
Hideki WanibuchiDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.
Masakazu YashiroMolecular Oncology and Therapeutics, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Atsushi AzumiOphthalmology Department and Eye Center, Kobe Kaisei Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Shigeru HondaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the molecular biological differences between conjunctival mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma and orbital MALT lymphoma in ocular adnexa lymphoma. Methods: Observational case series. A total of 129 consecutive, randomized cases of ocular adnexa MALT lymphoma diagnosed histopathologically between 2008 and 2020.Total RNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue from ocular adnexa MALT lymphoma, and RNA-sequencing was performed. Orbital MALT lymphoma gene expression was compared with that of conjunctival MALT lymphoma. Gene set (GS) analysis detecting for gene set cluster was performed in RNA-sequence. Related proteins were further examined by immunohistochemical staining. In addition, artificial segmentation image used to count stromal area in HE images. Results: GS analysis showed differences in expression in 29 GS types in primary orbital MALT lymphoma (N=5,5, FDR q-value <0.25). The GS with the greatest difference in expression was the GS of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Based on this GS change, immunohistochemical staining was added using E-cadherin as an epithelial marker and vimentin as a mesenchymal marker for EMT. There was significant staining of vimentin in orbital lymphoma ( Conclusion: GS changes including EMT and stromal area in tumor were used to demonstrate the molecular biological differences between conjunctival MALT lymphoma and orbital MALT lymphoma in ocular adnexa lymphomas.

Indexed as

artificial segmentation imageepithelial-mesenchymal transitionextranodal marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue typeocular adnexa MALT lymphomaRNA sequencingtumor stromavimentin

Identifiers

PMID38322414
PMCPMC10845137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.