ReviewHepatobiliary surgery and nutrition2024
International consensus guidelines on robotic pancreatic surgery in 2023.
Review in Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Robotic versus laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy across the learning curve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Robotic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes in Western vs. Eastern Centers.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Minimal Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Metanalysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Global research trends in necrotizing pancreatitis: a bibliometric analysis from 2013 to 2024.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Enucleation vs Pancreatoduodenectomy for Benign and Low-Grade Pancreatic Head Tumors.JAMA surgery · 2026Article
- Transitioning to the robotic era for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: initial implementation and outcomes in a single center.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Radiofrequency-based stump management and ductal ablation in robotic central pancreatectomy: a technical note and initial experience.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus open Frey procedure in chronic pancreatitis: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and pancreatic surgery in the 21st century: triumphs, turning points, and unresolved challenges.Updates in surgery · 2026Review
- External Validation of the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery Complexity Grading System for Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy: Insights From the IGOMIPS Registry.Annals of surgery · 2026Article
- Parenchyma-Sparing Pancreatic Surgery: Current Indications, Results, and Future Prospects.Cancers · 2026Review
- Review
- Anatomy-based individualised trocar placement in robotic pancreatic surgery: challenging the universal approach.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- MyIntuitive telemetry identifies proficiency thresholds in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Innovative Robotic Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy with Clockwise Quadrant Lymphadenectomy via SMA-LRV Axes and Double Wrapping.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Review
- ROBO-SURG: perceived robotic outcomes and behavior in operative surgery - a global cross-sectional web survey of training, practice patterns, and perceived clinical outcomes : the protocol.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Robotic hepatopancreatobiliary surgery using the Toumai® system: initial experience and technical considerations from a single center.Updates in surgery · 2025Article
- Robotic Approach to Oncologic Pancreatoduodenectomy in a Case with an Aberrant Hepatic Artery Originating from the Superior Mesenteric Artery.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- [Application Value of Pancreatic Duct-to-Jejunum Stent-Bridging Internal Drainage in Robotic Central Pancreatectomy].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With the rapid development of robotic surgery, especially for the abdominal surgery, robotic pancreatic surgery (RPS) has been applied increasingly around the world. However, evidence-based guidelines regarding its application, safety, and efficacy are still lacking. To harvest robust evidence and comprehensive clinical practice, this study aims to develop international guidelines on the use of RPS. Methods: World Health Organization (WHO) Handbook for Guideline Development, GRADE Grid method, Delphi vote, and the AGREE-II instrument were used to establish the Guideline Steering Group, Guideline Development Group, and Guideline Secretary Group, formulate 19 clinical questions, develop the recommendations, and draft the guidelines. Three online meetings were held on 04/12/2020, 30/11/2021, and 25/01/2022 to vote on the recommendations and get advice and suggestions from all involved experts. All the experts focusing on minimally invasive surgery from America, Europe and Oceania made great contributions to this consensus guideline. Results: After a systematic literature review 176 studies were included, 19 questions were addressed and 14 recommendations were developed through the expert assessment and comprehensive judgment of the quality and credibility of the evidence. Conclusions: The international RPS guidelines can guide current practice for surgeons, patients, medical societies, hospital administrators, and related social communities. Further randomized trials are required to determine the added value of RPS as compared to open and laparoscopic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.