ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2024
Algorithmic approach utilizing histology and immunohistochemistry for the current classification of diffuse glioma.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDiffuse glioma constitutes 28% of primary brain tumors. Until recently morphologic appearance was the only criterion for classifying these tumors. However, WHO 2016 incorporates molecular information in the primary diagnosis of gliomas such as Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1), Alpha thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X inked (ATRX) as well as 1p/19q codeletion on FISH. In a resource-limited setup where FISH is not available, Alpha internexin (INA) has been suggested as a surrogate IHC marker. MATERIAL AND
methodsCross-sectional study conducted in the Department of Pathology for two years. Tissue blocks and clinical as well as radiological details were obtained from departmental archives. After assessing the morphologic details, routine IHC markers such as GFAP, Ki67 and P53 along with molecular markers like IDH-1, ATRX, and lNA were applied.
resultsOut of 55 cases of diffuse glioma, 23 cases of astrocytoma and 32 cases of oligodendroglioma with an overall mean age of presentation of 41.49 ± 12.47 years. IDH-1 expression among diffuse glioma was 89.1% in our study. Alteration in the ATRX gene expression was observed in 95.7% of astrocytomas. 75% of oligodendrogliomas expressed INA with no significant difference in expression between the two grades. Based on the algorithmic approach using molecular surrogate markers, diffuse gliomas were categorized into six distinct groups. IDH-mutant, ATRX loss of expression astrocytoma and IDH-mutant, INA positive oligodendroglioma are two categories that do not require further molecular testing. This comprises 72.7% of the cases and these do not warrant further workup.
conclusionImplementation of combined phenotypic-genotypic diagnosis with the use of histomorphology and immunohistochemical surrogates for molecular genetic alterations will yield more homogeneous and narrowly defined diagnostic entities which will provide better prognostication and definitive treatment. It also is cost-effective in a resource-limited setup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38322173PMC10839248What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.