ArticleMethodsX2024
Improved method for stress detection using bio-sensor technology and machine learning algorithms.
Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Machine Learning-Assisted Optical Sensing Arrays for Disease Diagnosis.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Examining the Use of Consumer Wearable Devices and Digital Tools for Stress Measurement in College Students: Scoping Review of Methods.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- Deep Learning and Noninvasive Sensors for Detecting Physiological Dysregulation: A Scoping Review.Journal of medical systems · 2026Review
- Explainable artificial intelligence for predictive modeling of student stress in higher education.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- QuadTPat: Quadruple Transition Pattern-based explainable feature engineering model for stress detection using EEG signals.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Maintaining an optimal stress level is vital in our lives, yet many individuals struggle to identify the sources of their stress. As emotional stability and mental awareness become increasingly important, wearable medical technology has gained popularity in recent years. This technology enables real-time monitoring, providing medical professionals with crucial physiological data to enhance patient care. Current stress-detection methods, such as ECG, BVP, and body movement analysis, are limited by their rigidity and susceptibility to noise interference. To overcome these limitations, we introduce STRESS-CARE, a versatile stress detection sensor employing a hybrid approach. This innovative system utilizes a sweat sensor, cutting-edge context identification methods, and machine learning algorithms. STRESS-CARE processes sensor data and models environmental fluctuations using an XG Boost classifier. By combining these advanced techniques, we aim to revolutionize stress detection, offering a more adaptive and robust solution for improved stress management and overall well-being.•In the proposed method, we introduce a state-of-the-art stress detection device with Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) sweat sensors, outperforming traditional Electrocardiogram (ECG) methods while remaining non-invasive•Integrating machine learning, particularly XG-Boost algorithms, enhances detection accuracy and reliability.•This study sheds light on noise context comprehension for various wearable devices, offering crucial guidance for optimizing stress detection in multiple contexts and applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.