Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38322100›Full record

ArticleReumatologia2023

Scleroderma-overlap syndromes: capillaroscopy, laboratory, and clinical manifestations and follow-up compared to scleroderma patients.

Saeedeh Shenavandeh, Zahra Azariyon, Mohammad Ali Nazarinia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reumatologia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saeedeh ShenavandehDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0522-7186
Zahra AzariyonDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Iran.
Mohammad Ali NazariniaDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2045-2958

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Overlap syndrome (OS) is a group of systemic connective tissue diseases (CTDs) that meet the criteria of two or more CTDs. In this study, we evaluated clinical, laboratory, and capillaroscopic manifestations of patients with scleroderma OS (SSc-OS) and its subgroups and follow-up progression compared to patients with limited SSc (LcSSc). Material and methods: In a 10-year cross-sectional study, we evaluated 135 adult patients (70 with SSc-OS and 65 with LcSSc) with the same skin score for their baseline and follow-up clinical, laboratory, high-resolution chest tomography (HRCT), echocardiography, and nailfold capillaroscopy data and compared them. Results: Of the 135 patients, 70 had SSc-OS, including 45 (64.3%) cases of SSc-SS (Sjögren's syndrome), 11 (15.7%) of SSc-RA (rheumatoid arthritis), 9 (12.9%) of SSc-myositis and 5 (1.7%) of SSc-SLE (systemic lupus erythematosus), and 65 had LcSSc. Lung and heart involvement and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) did not differ between the two groups ( Conclusions: In SSc-OS patients, the most common subgroup was SSc-SS. Scleroderma OS was associated with lower major organ involvement and capillaroscopy progression than LcSSc. Major organ involvement in patients with SSc-OS was significantly lower than in LcSSc patients. In the follow-up, new DU was not seen in the SSc-OS with lower progression of lung involvement, skin score, and capillary damage.

Indexed as

interstitial lung diseasenailfold capillaroscopypulmonary arterial hypertensionsclerodermascleroderma-overlap

Identifiers

PMID38322100
PMCPMC10839915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.