ReviewCureus2024
A Systematic Review of Patient Satisfaction With Removable Partial Dentures (RPDs).
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wear resistance of CAD-CAM-milled PEEK, PEKK, and cobalt-chromium removable partial denture frameworks for implant-assisted removable partial dentures against zirconia crowns during simulated insertion/removal cycling in a mandibular Kennedy Class I model.The journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2026Article
- Factors associated with successful removable partial denture treatment: an analysis of clinical outcomes and post-insertion events.The journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2026Article
- Multifactorial determinants of complications and patient-reported outcomes in metal clasp-retained removable partial dentures.The journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2026Article
- Comparison of retentive force and deformation of selective laser melting and conventional cobalt-chromium clasps of removable partial denture.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Assessing Esthetic and Functional Benefits of Three Types of Maxillary Partial Denture Designs over Five Years.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Impact of a removable prosthesis on chewing ability, quality of life, and patient satisfaction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Finite Element Analysis of Implant-Assisted Mandibular Distal Extension Removable Partial Denture: Evaluating Stress Distribution in Premolar Versus Molar Implant Positions-An In-Silico Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Success of Immediate Implants in the Esthetic Zone: A Narrative Review with Case Illustration.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Article
- Comparison of Increase in Masticatory Efficiency Between Removable Partial Dentures Retained With Clasps and Retained With Attachments.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025Article
- Key Factors Influencing Outpatient Satisfaction in Chronic Disease Care: Insights from the 2023 Korea HSES.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Satisfaction among edentulous patients before and after conventional complete denture.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- The Applications of 3D-Printing Technology in Prosthodontics: A Review of the Current Literature.Cureus · 2024Review
- Investigation of the wear resistance of different artificial teeth materials in removable dentures.Bioinformation · 2024Article
- Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of prosthetic rehabilitation for partially edentulous teeth in India: A comparative study of Clasp-Retained RPDs, Thermoplastic Resin RPDs, and Cast Partial Dentures.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Removable partial dentures (RPDs) offer a broad range of aesthetics and restorative functions for partially edentulous patients. This systematic review examines patients' satisfaction rates and the factors that influence RPD satisfaction. This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. A systematic literature search was done on PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar using preset inclusion criteria. A total of 923 non-duplicate articles were screened, and 35 were included in this review. Among the included studies, RPDs generally exhibited high satisfaction rates, with reported rates ranging between 50% and 81%. Several factors influenced satisfaction. Age played a major role, with older adults expressing higher satisfaction. Gender differences were also noted, especially in appearance satisfaction where women were more satisfied with RPDs than men. Prior experience with RPDs correlated positively with overall satisfaction. The number and location of missing teeth, as well as the type of RPD (metal vs. flexible), significantly influenced satisfaction levels. Flexible dentures were more satisfactory than metal RPDs. Attachments, such as magnetic attachments and implants, increased satisfaction. Patient complaints, encompassing pain, aesthetics, and cleanliness, were identified as common sources of dissatisfaction. The results underscore the significance of customizing RPD treatment to individual needs, considering factors that influence RPD satisfaction. Recognizing the importance of influential factors such as age, gender RPD experience, etc., for clinicians seeking to optimize patient outcomes in RPD therapy is crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.