Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38322077›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

A Systematic Review of Patient Satisfaction With Removable Partial Dentures (RPDs).

Mohammed Awawdeh, Meshari B Alotaibi, Abdualrhman H Alharbi, Sultan A Alnafisah, Turki S Alasiri, Naif Ibrahim Alrashidi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohammed AwawdehCollege of Dentistry, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Riyadh, SAU.
Meshari B AlotaibiCollege of Dentistry, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Riyadh, SAU.
Abdualrhman H AlharbiCollege of Dentistry, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Riyadh, SAU.
Sultan A AlnafisahCollege of Dentistry, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Riyadh, SAU.
Turki S AlasiriCollege of Dentistry, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Riyadh, SAU.
Naif Ibrahim AlrashidiCollege of Dentistry, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Removable partial dentures (RPDs) offer a broad range of aesthetics and restorative functions for partially edentulous patients. This systematic review examines patients' satisfaction rates and the factors that influence RPD satisfaction. This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. A systematic literature search was done on PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar using preset inclusion criteria. A total of 923 non-duplicate articles were screened, and 35 were included in this review. Among the included studies, RPDs generally exhibited high satisfaction rates, with reported rates ranging between 50% and 81%. Several factors influenced satisfaction. Age played a major role, with older adults expressing higher satisfaction. Gender differences were also noted, especially in appearance satisfaction where women were more satisfied with RPDs than men. Prior experience with RPDs correlated positively with overall satisfaction. The number and location of missing teeth, as well as the type of RPD (metal vs. flexible), significantly influenced satisfaction levels. Flexible dentures were more satisfactory than metal RPDs. Attachments, such as magnetic attachments and implants, increased satisfaction. Patient complaints, encompassing pain, aesthetics, and cleanliness, were identified as common sources of dissatisfaction. The results underscore the significance of customizing RPD treatment to individual needs, considering factors that influence RPD satisfaction. Recognizing the importance of influential factors such as age, gender RPD experience, etc., for clinicians seeking to optimize patient outcomes in RPD therapy is crucial.

Indexed as

aestheticschewing abilityoutcomespartial denturepartial edentulouspatient satisfactionremovable dentureremovable partial denturesatisfactionsatisfaction rate

Identifiers

PMID38322077
PMCPMC10846565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.