ArticlePediatrics2024
Advice to Clinicians From Expectant Parents at Extreme Prematurity: A Multimethod Study.
Article in Pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Parent-to-parent recommendations for coping with congenital heart disease: a mixed-methods study.Archives of disease in childhood · 2026Article
- Development of a Joint-Specialty Simulation-Based Workshop to Optimize Counseling at Extreme Prematurity.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2026Article
- Developing and validating an explainable digital mortality prediction tool for extremely preterm infants.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesDespite recommendations for patient-centered counseling on extreme prematurity, clinicians often miss opportunities to communicate in a way that facilitates parental knowledge, decision-making, and emotional support. In this study, we aimed to determine empirical, parent-derived recommendations and advice for clinicians counseling on extreme prematurity.
methodsPregnant women (and their partners) admitted at 22 0/7 to 25 6/7 weeks' estimated gestation participated in postantenatal counseling semi-structured interviews or questionnaires to explore parental preferences in the counseling process, including advice to clinicians. Thematic analysis was performed.
resultsA total of 39 interviews and 47 questionnaires, representing 62 total prenatal consultations, were completed. Thematic analysis of participants' advice to clinicians from both interview and questionnaire data resulted in 14 parent-derived recommendations to clinicians who counsel expectant parents at extreme prematurity. Parental recommendations related to compassionately engaging, supporting, and communicating with families, as well as aligning teams and following up.
conclusionsWe present an empirical parent-derived, family-centered, and practical approach for clinicians counseling on extreme prematurity. Future studies should include a more diverse patient population and assess the impact of these recommendations on the counseling process and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.