Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38321887›Full record

ArticleNeurointervention2024

Cutting Balloon Angioplasty for Severe In-Stent Restenosis after Carotid Artery Stenting: Long-Term Outcomes and Review of Literature.

Jeong-Yoon Lee, Min-Surk Kye, Jonguk Kim, Do Yeon Kim, Jun Yup Kim, Sung Hyun Baik, Jihoon Kang, Beom Joon Kim, Hee-Joon Bae, Cheolkyu Jung

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurointervention, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Carotid artery stenting for heavily calcified lesions after plaque modification using scoring balloon angioplasty.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jeong-Yoon LeeDepartment of Neurology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Min-Surk KyeSeoul Singil Rehabilitation Clinic, Seoul, Korea.
Jonguk KimDepartment of Translational Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Do Yeon KimDepartment of Neurology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Jun Yup KimDepartment of Neurology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Sung Hyun BaikDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Jihoon KangDepartment of Neurology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Beom Joon KimDepartment of Neurology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Hee-Joon BaeDepartment of Neurology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Cheolkyu JungDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KRKangnam Sacred Heart Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCutting balloon-percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (CB-PTA) is a feasible treatment option for in-stent restenosis (ISR) after carotid artery stenting (CAS). However, the longterm durability and safety of CB-PTA for ISR after CAS have not been well established. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with ISR after CAS who had been treated with CB-PTA from 2012 to 2021 in our center. Detailed information of baseline characteristics, periprocedural and long-term outcomes, and follow-up imaging was collected.

resultsDuring 2012-2021, a total of 301 patients underwent CAS. Of which, CB-PTA was performed on 20 lesions exhibiting severe ISR in 18 patients following CAS. No patient had any history of receiving carotid endarterectomy or radiation therapy. These lesions were located at the cervical segment of the internal carotid artery (n=16), proximal external carotid artery (n=1), and distal common carotid artery (n=1). The median time interval between initial CAS and detection of ISR was 390 days (interquartile range 324-666 days). The follow-up period ranged from 9 months to 9 years with a median value of 21 months. Four patients (22.2%) were symptomatic. The average of stenotic degree before and after the procedure was 79.2% and 34.7%, respectively. Out of the 18 patients receiving CB-PTA, 16 (88.9%) did not require additional stenting, and 16 (88.9%) did not experience recurrent ISR during the follow-up period. Two patients who experienced recurrent ISR were successfully treated with CB-PTA and additional stenting. No periprocedural complication was observed in any case.

conclusionRegarding favorable periprocedural and long-term outcomes in our single-center experience, CB-PTA was a feasible and safe option for the treatment of severe ISR after CAS.

Indexed as

Balloon angioplastyCarotid artery stenosisEndovascular procedureStent

Identifiers

PMID38321887
PMCPMC10910177
OpenAlexW4391611714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.