ArticleTexas Heart Institute journal2024
Interventional Treatment Options for the Prevention of Amputation in Patients With Lower Extremity Wounds From Peripheral Arterial Disease.
Article in Texas Heart Institute journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeripheral arterial disease and related lower extremity wounds are prominent causes of amputation. Revascularization may reduce amputation rates or the amputation margin more distally in patients with peripheral arterial disease who have wounds resulting from critical limb ischemia. This study examined the association of risk factors and intervention types with amputation rates in patients with critical lower extremity arterial disease.
methodsA total of 211 patients who underwent peripheral intervention because of foot wound were followed up for 12 months after the intervention. All patients had lower extremity wounds resulting from peripheral arterial disease. The effects of treatment approaches were compared in patients who underwent and did not undergo amputation.
resultsRevascularization of the anterior tibial artery reduced the amputation rate by 6.52 times compared with occlusion. Posterior tibial artery revascularization reduced the amputation rate by 49.95 times.
conclusionIn this study of percutaneous intervention methods for prevention of amputation, the most effective option was revascularization of the posterior tibial artery and anterior tibial artery. Considering these results, treatment of critical peripheral arterial disease can be cost-effective and efficient and may shorten procedure time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.