Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38321776›Full record

ArticleClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

Coagulation Testing in Real-World Setting: Insights From a Comprehensive Survey.

Hae In Bang, Ja Young Lee, Hyun-Young Kim, Saeam Shin, Myung Hyun Nam, In-Suk Kim, Ji Myung Kim, Jong-Hyun Yoon, Myung-Geun Shin, Sang Mee Hwang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Contemporary approaches to treat people with hemophilia: what's new and what's not?Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hae In BangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, The Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7854-3011
Ja Young LeeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, The Republic of Korea.
Hyun-Young KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, The Republic of Korea.
Saeam ShinDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, The Republic of Korea.
Myung Hyun NamDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, The Republic of Korea.
In-Suk KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, The Republic of Korea.
Ji Myung KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, The Republic of Korea.
Jong-Hyun YoonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, The Republic of Korea.
Myung-Geun ShinDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School and Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, The Republic of Korea.
Sang Mee HwangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, The Republic of Korea.
Sun-Young KongDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Goyang, The Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this survey was to gain a real-world perspective on coagulation testing by evaluating the availability of various coagulation laboratory tests, assessing specific analytic and postanalytic steps in clinical laboratories in Korea.Participants were surveyed using a 65-question questionnaire specifically focused on their coagulation testing practices related to prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), plasma-mixing studies, lupus anticoagulant (LA) tests, platelet function tests, coagulation factor assays, and the composition of hemostasis and thrombosis test panels. The survey was performed between July and September 2022.The survey achieved a 77.9% (81 of 104) response rate. PT or aPTT tests were performed directly at all participating institutions, followed by D-dimer and fibrinogen tests, platelet function test, and plasma-mixing studies in order of frequency. Variations existed in the performance of mixing test and LA assessment. Patterns of coagulating testing differed depending on the size of the hospital. The survey revealed that most laboratories conducted coagulation tests following the international guidelines such as Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines and the Korean Laboratory Certification system. However, some coagulation tests, including mixing test and LA tests, are yet to be standardized in Korea.Continuous education on coagulation test methods and internal and external quality control are required to encourage laboratories to enhance the performance of coagulation testing.

Indexed as

Blood CoagulationLupus Coagulation InhibitorBlood Coagulation TestsHumansPartial Thromboplastin TimeProthrombin TimeSurveys and QuestionnairesLupus Coagulation Inhibitorblood coagulationlupus anticoagulantplasma-mixing studiesplatelet function testsstandardizationsurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID38321776
PMCPMC10851719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.