Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38321624›Full record

ArticleJournal of chest surgery2024

Emergent Esophagectomy in Patients with Esophageal Malignancy Is Associated with Higher Rates of Perioperative Complications but No Independent Impact on Short-Term Mortality.

Yahya Alwatari, Devon C Freudenberger, Jad Khoraki, Lena Bless, Riley Payne, Walker A Julliard, Rachit D Shah, Carlos A Puig

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chest surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Patients Undergoing Oesophageal Cancer Surgery Do Not Have Impaired Haemostasis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yahya AlwatariSection of Thoracic & Foregut Surgery, Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0219-3251
Devon C FreudenbergerSection of Thoracic & Foregut Surgery, Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9117-0130
Jad KhorakiSection of Thoracic & Foregut Surgery, Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5432-4399
Lena BlessSection of Thoracic & Foregut Surgery, Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5704-5257
Riley PayneSection of Thoracic & Foregut Surgery, Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4179-4746
Walker A JulliardSection of Thoracic & Foregut Surgery, Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8951-1728
Rachit D ShahSection of Thoracic & Foregut Surgery, Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3632-3034
Carlos A PuigSection of Thoracic & Foregut Surgery, Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7513-0721
Virginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Data on perioperative outcomes of emergent versus elective resection in esophageal cancer patients requiring esophagectomy are lacking. We investigated whether emergent resection was associated with increased risks of morbidity and mortality. Methods: Data on patients with esophageal malignancy who underwent esophagectomy from 2005 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Thirty-day complication and mortality rates were compared between emergent esophagectomy (EE) and non-emergent esophagectomy. Logistic regression assessed factors associated with complications and mortality. Results: Of 10,067 patients with malignancy who underwent esophagectomy, 181 (1.8%) had EE, 64% had preoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, or septic shock, and 44% had bleeding requiring transfusion. The EE group had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class and functional dependency. More transhiatal esophagectomies and diversions were performed in the EE group. After EE, the rates of 30-day mortality (6.1% vs. 2.8%), overall complications (65.2% vs. 44.2%), bleeding, pneumonia, prolonged intubation, and positive margin (17.7% vs. 7.4%) were higher, while that of anastomotic leak was similar. On adjusted logistic regression, older age, lower albumin, higher ASA class, and fragility were associated with increased complications and mortality. McKeown esophagectomy and esophageal diversion were associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications. EE was associated with 30-day postoperative complications (odds ratio, 2.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.66-3.43; p<0.0001). Conclusion: EE was associated with a more than 2-fold increase in complications compared to elective procedures, but no independent increase in short-term mortality. These findings may help guide data-driven critical decision-making for surgery in select cases of complicated esophageal malignancy.

Indexed as

EmergentEsophagectomyNational Surgical Quality Improvement ProgramPerioperative outcomes

Identifiers

PMID38321624
PMCPMC10927421
OpenAlexW4391609754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.