Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38321576›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2024

Randomised controlled feasibility study protocol of the Carers-ID online intervention to support the mental health of family carers of people with intellectual disabilities.

Mark A Linden, Rachel Leonard, Trisha Forbes, Michael Brown, Lynne Marsh, Stuart Todd, Nathan Hughes, Maria Truesdale

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05737823 (Randomised Controlled Feasibility Study and Exploratory Trial of the Carers-ID Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05737823 naunknown statusnot on this map

Randomised Controlled Feasibility Study and Exploratory Trial of the Carers-ID Intervention: Supporting Family Carers' Mental Health Following the COVID-19 Pandemic

TypeinterventionalSponsorQueen's University, BelfastRan2023 to 2025Enrolled120ConditionsFeasibilityArmsCarers-ID online support programme, Carers-ID online support programme - Wait-list control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mark A LindenMedical Biology Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, Ireland.
Rachel LeonardMedical Biology Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, Ireland. rachel.leonard@qub.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8753-4632
Trisha ForbesMedical Biology Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, Ireland.
Michael BrownMedical Biology Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, Ireland.
Lynne MarshMedical Biology Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, Ireland.
Stuart ToddSchool of Care Sciences, University of South Wales, Caerleon, Wales.
Nathan HughesDepartment of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
Maria TruesdaleSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily carers play a crucial role in supporting the health and well-being of people with intellectual disabilities. Given their role and responsibilities, many family carers experience significant and ongoing stress and mental health difficulties. Programmes and interventions which provide training and support to family carers have been shown to have a positive impact on levels of stress and quality of life. However, these are often face to face which can create barriers to full participation. Online interventions have been shown to offer flexibility in delivery compared with traditional face-to-face approaches. The primary objective of this study is to determine the feasibility of delivering the Carers-ID online intervention, while the secondary outcome is improved mental health in family carers of people with intellectual disabilities.

methodsFamily carers (n = 120) will be randomised to receive the intervention (n = 60) or assigned to a wait-list control (n = 60) group. The intervention ( www.Carers-ID.com ) consists of 14 modules which cover topics including the following: promoting resilience, providing peer support, reducing anxiety, managing stress, accessing local supports and managing family conflict and information for siblings who are carers. The intervention has been co-produced with voluntary sector organisations and family carers and tested for acceptability. Primary outcomes for this study include acceptability and feasibility of the outcome measures, recruitment, participation and retention rates and effect sizes. Secondary outcomes will be completed at three time points (baseline, following intervention completion and 3 months after completion). These include the following: the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale, the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale, the Resilience Scale and the Social Connectedness Scale Revised. Participants (n = 12) who have taken part in the intervention arm of the research will be invited to participate in semi-structured interviews as part of the process evaluation. DISCUSSION: The Carers-ID intervention provides an online resource for family carers to support their mental health and well-being and promote their resilience. It represents an affordable and accessible means of delivering such support. Testing the feasibility of the intervention and related trial procedures is required to determine whether a full-scale randomised controlled trial to evaluate the intervention's effectiveness is warranted.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov : NCT05737823.

Indexed as

COVID-19Family carersFeasibilityIntellectual disabilityMental healthProtocolRandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID38321576
PMCPMC10845768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.