Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38321567›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2024

A feasibility (pilot) mixed methods study of an innovative non-pharmacological breath-based yoga and social-emotional intervention program in an at-risk youth sample in London, Canada.

Akshya Vasudev, Emily Ionson, Janani Sathiaselan, Anurag Thatipalli, Aman Chauhan, Christine Hassan, Javeed Sukhera, Mark Speechley, Cheryl Forchuk

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02749240 (A Feasibility), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02749240 early_phase1completednot on this map

A Feasibility (Pilot) Study of an Innovative Non-pharmacological Intervention Program in at Risk Youth

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sRan2016 to 2019Enrolled39ConditionsAt Risk YouthArmsYouth Empowerment Seminar, YES!
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Akshya VasudevIntegrative Psychiatry Lab, Lawson Health Research Institute and Parkwood Institute of Research, Parkwood Mental Health Building, Parkwood Hospital, London, ON, Canada. akshyavasudev@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0423-4598
Emily IonsonIntegrative Psychiatry Lab, Lawson Health Research Institute and Parkwood Institute of Research, Parkwood Mental Health Building, Parkwood Hospital, London, ON, Canada.
Janani SathiaselanIntegrative Psychiatry Lab, Lawson Health Research Institute and Parkwood Institute of Research, Parkwood Mental Health Building, Parkwood Hospital, London, ON, Canada.
Anurag ThatipalliIntegrative Psychiatry Lab, Lawson Health Research Institute and Parkwood Institute of Research, Parkwood Mental Health Building, Parkwood Hospital, London, ON, Canada.
Aman ChauhanIntegrative Psychiatry Lab, Lawson Health Research Institute and Parkwood Institute of Research, Parkwood Mental Health Building, Parkwood Hospital, London, ON, Canada.
Christine HassanIntegrative Psychiatry Lab, Lawson Health Research Institute and Parkwood Institute of Research, Parkwood Mental Health Building, Parkwood Hospital, London, ON, Canada.
Javeed SukheraDepartment of Psychiatry, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, and London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
Mark SpeechleyDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Cheryl ForchukDepartment of Psychiatry, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, and London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.

Funding

Lawson Health Research Institute IRF
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVarious service provision models for youth at risk of homelessness have been researched and implemented, including access to housing and physical and mental health resources. However, even with these interventions, we remain unaware of how best to manage symptoms of depression and anxiety and the rate of drug use in these populations primarily because of a lack of feasibility data.

methodsThis paper presents the results of a mixed-methods study in London, Canada, that examined the feasibility of implementing a biopsychosocial intervention, SKY Schools, in at-risk youth aged between 16 and 25 (n = 49). The study also recorded qualitative responses about the program's usefulness from the perspective of the service users. The SKY Schools intervention consisted of social-emotional learning combined with Sudarshan Kriya Yoga, a standardized yoga-based breathing exercise routine. The intervention program was divided into two phases: an active learning phase and a reinforcement phase. The following feasibility outcome measures were collected: (1) the number of potential participants approached per month, (2) number (proportion) who were successfully screened, (3) the proportion of screened participants who enrolled, (4) the rate of retention in the study, (5) rate of adherence to study protocol, (6) proportion of planned ratings that were completed, (7) intervention cost per case, (8) completeness of final data for analysis, (9) length of time to collect all data, (10) quality of all collected data, (11) determining if partnering community organizations were willing to conduct the study as per study protocol, (12) determining if there were any capacity issues with partners providing intervention and investigators being able to perform the tasks that they were committed to doing, (13) determining if there were any problems of entering the data into a computer, (14) preliminary data about the safety of the intervention, and (15) preliminary estimate of treatment effects.

resultsAll feasibility outcome measures were collectible. In the city of London, Canada it was feasible to conduct a pilot study in this population of youth at risk of homelessness. Foremost among the findings was a high retention rate (61.2%) and overall positive qualitative feedback with a number of potential suggestions to improve the delivery and quality of the intervention. However, we had a significantly low recruitment rate (0.27 participants per week) suggesting that multiple sites will be needed to achieve an adequate sample size for a subsequent definitive trial.

conclusionsFuture researchers may consider the findings of this feasibility study when designing a randomized control trial to further assess the efficacy and tolerability of SKY Schools.

trial registrationTrial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02749240. Registered April 22, 2016, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02749240 .

Indexed as

DepressionHomelessMental healthYogaYouth at-risk

Identifiers

PMID38321567
PMCPMC10848429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.