Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38321539›Full record

ArticleSpecial care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry

Risk factors for oral infection and dry socket post-tooth extraction in medically complex patients in the absence of antibiotic prophylaxis: A case-control study.

Taylor L Boyer, Pooja Solanki, Jessina C McGregor, Geneva M Wilson, Gretchen Gibson, M Marianne Jurasic, Charlesnika T Evans, Katie J Suda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Taylor L BoyerCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8280-850X
Pooja SolankiCenter of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Edward Hines Jr. VA Medical Center, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Hines, Illinois, USA.
Jessina C McGregorOregon State University College of Pharmacy, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Geneva M WilsonCenter of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Edward Hines Jr. VA Medical Center, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Hines, Illinois, USA.
Gretchen GibsonVeterans Health Administration Office of Dentistry, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9345-8552
M Marianne JurasicVeterans Health Administration Office of Dentistry, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Charlesnika T EvansCenter of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Edward Hines Jr. VA Medical Center, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Hines, Illinois, USA.
Katie J SudaCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

Improving Veteran Health by Increasing Dental Stewardship of Antibiotics and OpioidsI01HX002452 · VA · EDWARD HINES JR VA HOSPITAL · PI SUDA, KJ · 2018 to 2021
–
HSR&D Research Career Scientist AwardIK6HX003156 · VA · EDWARD HINES JR VA HOSPITAL · PI EVANS, CHARLESNIKA T · 2020 to 2025
–
Health Services Research and Development IIR 17-039HSRD VA I01 HX002452HSRD VA IK6 HX003156Office of Research and DevelopmentU.S. Department of Veterans AffairsVeterans Health Administration
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDry socket and infection are complications of tooth extractions. The objective was to determine risk factors for post-extraction complications in patients without antibiotic prophylaxis stratified by early- and late-complications and complication type (oral infection and dry socket).

methodsRetrospective, case (with complications)-control (without complications) study of patients (n = 708) who had ≥1 extraction performed at any Veterans Health Administration facility between 2015-2019 and were not prescribed an antibiotic 30 days pre-extraction.

resultsEarly complication cases (n = 109) were more likely to be female [odds ratio (OR) = 2.06; 95% confidence interval (CI):1.05-4.01], younger (OR = 0.29; 95% CI:0.09-0.94 patients ≥ 80 years old, reference:18-44 years), Native American/Alaska Native (OR = 21.11; 95% CI:2.33-191.41) and have fewer teeth extracted (OR = 0.53 3+ teeth extracted; 95% CI:0.31-0.88, reference:1 tooth extracted). Late complication cases (n = 67) were more likely to have a bipolar diagnosis (OR = 2.98; 95% CI:1.04-8.57), history of implant placement (OR = 8.27; 95% CI:1.63-41.82), and history of past smoking (OR = 2.23; 95% CI:1.28-3.88).

conclusionPredictors for post-extraction complications among patients who did not receive antibiotic prophylaxis were similar to prior work in cohorts who received prophylaxis. Unique factors identified in a medically complex population included being younger, Native American/Alaska Native, having mental health conditions, history of a dental implant, and fewer teeth extracted.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisDry SocketSurgical Wound InfectionTooth ExtractionAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCase-Control StudiesDental ImplantsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsDental Implantsalveolar osteitisantibiotic prophylaxisdentistryextractionoral infection

Identifiers

PMID38321539
PMCPMC11590180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.