Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38321504›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts2024

Oxygenation influences xylose fermentation and gene expression in the yeast genera Spathaspora and Scheffersomyces.

Katharina O Barros, Megan Mader, David J Krause, Jasmyn Pangilinan, Bill Andreopoulos, Anna Lipzen, Stephen J Mondo, Igor V Grigoriev, Carlos A Rosa, Trey K Sato and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Katharina O BarrosDOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9827-5966
Megan MaderDOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
David J KrauseDOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Jasmyn PangilinanU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7966-3496
Bill AndreopoulosU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9097-1123
Anna LipzenU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2293-9329
Stephen J MondoU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5797-0647
Igor V GrigorievU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3136-8903
Carlos A RosaDepartamento de Microbiologia, ICB, C.P. 486, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0056-9075
Trey K SatoDOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. tksato@glbrc.wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6592-9337
Chris Todd HittingerDOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. cthittinger@wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5088-7461

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 406564/2022-1Fundação do Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais APQ-01525-14National Science Foundation DEB-2110403Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Graduate Education with funding from the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation H. I. Romnes Faculty FellowUSDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch Project 1020204U.S. Department of Energy DE-AC02-05CH11231U.S. Department of Energy DE-SC0018409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCost-effective production of biofuels from lignocellulose requires the fermentation of D-xylose. Many yeast species within and closely related to the genera Spathaspora and Scheffersomyces (both of the order Serinales) natively assimilate and ferment xylose. Other species consume xylose inefficiently, leading to extracellular accumulation of xylitol. Xylitol excretion is thought to be due to the different cofactor requirements of the first two steps of xylose metabolism. Xylose reductase (XR) generally uses NADPH to reduce xylose to xylitol, while xylitol dehydrogenase (XDH) generally uses NAD

resultsWe screened the growth of xylose-fermenting yeast species in high and moderate aeration and identified both ethanol producers and xylitol producers. Selected species were further characterized for their XR and XDH cofactor preferences by enzyme assays and gene expression patterns by RNA-Seq. Our data revealed that xylose metabolism is more redox balanced in some species, but it is strongly affected by oxygen levels. Under high aeration, most species switched from ethanol production to xylitol accumulation, despite the availability of ample oxygen to accept electrons from NADH. This switch was followed by decreases in enzyme activity and the expression of genes related to xylose metabolism, suggesting that bottlenecks in xylose fermentation are not always due to cofactor preferences. Finally, we expressed XYL genes from multiple Scheffersomyces species in a strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Recombinant S. cerevisiae expressing XYL1 from Scheffersomyces xylosifermentans, which encodes an XR without a cofactor preference, showed improved anaerobic growth on xylose as the primary carbon source compared to S. cerevisiae strain expressing XYL genes from Scheffersomyces stipitis.

conclusionCollectively, our data do not support the hypothesis that xylitol accumulation occurs primarily due to differences in cofactor preferences between xylose reductase and xylitol dehydrogenase; instead, gene expression plays a major role in response to oxygen levels. We have also identified the yeast Sc. xylosifermentans as a potential source for genes that can be engineered into S. cerevisiae to improve xylose fermentation and biofuel production.

Indexed as

AerationCofactorsEthanolGene expressionSerinales (CUG-Ser1 clade)XylitolXylitol dehydrogenaseXylose fermentationXylose reductase

Identifiers

PMID38321504
PMCPMC10848558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.