SynthesisBMC medicine2024
Co-designing care for multimorbidity: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Occupational Therapy Within Integrated Community Care Systems: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Policy and System-Level Evidence.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Spanish adaptation and validation of the Capability Cards for use in community primary health care.Primary health care research & development · 2026Article
- Co-design-related approaches in medication safety for people with dementia: A scoping review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- From guidelines to practice: general practitioners' consensus on indicators for managing selected multimorbidity in primary care in Western Australia.Family practice · 2026Article
- Understanding smokeless tobacco use in rural United States: A narrative synthesis of contributing factors and prevention efforts.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
- From Co-Design to Quality Improvement: Using the Double Diamond Framework to Develop Primary Care Redesign Priorities for Hypertension Care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Lessons Learned From the Implementation of a Pragmatic Trial Evaluating Non-Pharmacological Approaches to Dementia Care in US Nursing Homes.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- Intergenerational initiatives to support health and well-being of people aging with traumatic brain injury: an exploratory qualitative research protocol.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Person-Centered Multimorbidity Care in UK Primary Care: Identifying Changes to Practice.Annals of family medicine · 2026Article
- Feasibility and Acceptability of a Co-Designed Self-Management Programme for People Living With Kidney Failure.Journal of renal care · 2026Article
- Adolescents' understanding of pain and their preferences for learning about pain at school: a cross-sectional survey.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Extending the boundaries of care: Collaboratively planning connections between rehabilitation and community resources for chronic pain self-management.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2026Article
- Designing a provider-led multimorbidity care model for fragmented insurance-based health systems: A mixed-methods study in Colombia.PloS one · 2026Article
- Development of a text message intervention designed to promote safe contact lens wear.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025Article
- The involvement of individuals with speech and language impairments in research: insights from a co-creation process.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- Using the P-CaRES Tool to Identify Palliative Care Needs in Patients with Life-Limiting Diseases: An Analysis of Internal Medicine Admissions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Transesophageal echocardiography: Revolutionizing perioperative cardiac care.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Citizen science approaches in the development of post-stroke physical activity interventions: A scoping review.PloS one · 2025Article
- Utilization of Municipal Healthcare Services Among High-Cost Older Patients in Norwegian Somatic Hospitals: A Cross-Sectional Registry Study.Health services insights · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe co-design of health care enables patient-centredness by partnering patients, clinicians and other stakeholders together to create services.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review of co-designed health interventions for people living with multimorbidity and assessed (a) their effectiveness in improving health outcomes, (b) the co-design approaches used and (c) barriers and facilitators to the co-design process with people living with multimorbidity. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus and PsycINFO between 2000 and March 2022. Included experimental studies were quality assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool (ROB-2 and ROBINS-I).
resultsWe screened 14,376 reports, with 13 reports meeting the eligibility criteria. Two reported health and well-being outcomes: one randomised clinical trial (n = 134) and one controlled cohort (n = 1933). Outcome measures included quality of life, self-efficacy, well-being, anxiety, depression, functional status, healthcare utilisation and mortality. Outcomes favouring the co-design interventions compared to control were minimal, with only 4 of 17 outcomes considered beneficial. Co-design approaches included needs assessment/ideation (12 of 13), prototype (11 of 13), pilot testing (5 of 13) (i.e. focus on usability) and health and well-being evaluations (2 of 13). Common challenges to the co-design process include poor stakeholder interest, passive participation, power imbalances and a lack of representativeness in the design group. Enablers include flexibility in approach, smaller group work, advocating for stakeholders' views and commitment to the process or decisions made.
conclusionsIn this systematic review of co-design health interventions, we found that few projects assessed health and well-being outcomes, and the observed health and well-being benefits were minimal. The intensity and variability in the co-design approaches were substantial, and challenges were evident. Co-design aided the design of novel services and interventions for those with multimorbidity, improving their relevance, usability and acceptability. However, the clinical benefits of co-designed interventions for those with multimorbidity are unclear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.