Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2024
qSOFA combined with suPAR for early risk detection and guidance of antibiotic treatment in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03717350 (A suPAR Guided Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial of Initiation of Antibiotics for Presumed Infection at the Emergency Department), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A suPAR Guided Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial of Initiation of Antibiotics for Presumed Infection at the Emergency Department
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive enrichment using biomarkers in studies of critically-ill patients with sepsis: a systematic review.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Pancreatic Stone Protein in Co-Evaluation With QSOFA and News2 for Early Sepsis Detection at the Emergency Department.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2026Trial
- Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR): Role in the Risk Stratification of Potentially Infected Patients Presenting at the Emergency Department.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Efficacy of anakinra in reducing progression to organ dysfunction in patients with pneumonia (INSPIRE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IIa trial.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
- The immunology of sepsis: translating new insights into clinical practice.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026Review
- Recent advances in biomarkers for detection and diagnosis of sepsis and organ dysfunction: a comprehensive review.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Biomarkers to guide sepsis management.Annals of intensive care · 2025Review
- Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor: A Promising Biomarker for Mortality Prediction Among Critical ED Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Contributions of individual qSOFA elements to assessment of severity and for prediction of mortality.Annals of medicine · 2024Observational
- Improving prognostication of pneumonia among elderly patients: usefulness of suPAR.BMC geriatrics · 2024Observational
- Early sepsis recognition: how difficult can this be?Critical care (London, England) · 2024Article
- Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor (uPAR) in Inflammation and Disease: A Unique Inflammatory Pathway Activator.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- qSOFA combined with suPAR for early risk detection and guidance of antibiotic treatment in emergency department: a bit sweet and a bit sour randomized controlled trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSepsis guidelines suggest immediate start of resuscitation for patients with quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) 2 or 3. However, the interpretation of qSOFA 1 remains controversial. We investigated whether measurements of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) may improve risk detection when qSOFA is 1.
methodsThe study had two parts. At the first part, the combination of suPAR with qSOFA was analyzed in a prospective cohort for early risk detection. At the second part, the double-blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) SUPERIOR evaluated the efficacy of the suPAR-guided medical intervention. SUPERIOR took place between November 2018 and December 2020. Multivariate stepwise Cox regression was used for the prospective cohort, while univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used for the RCT. Consecutive admissions at the emergency department (ED) with suspected infection, qSOFA 1 and suPAR ≥ 12 ng/mL were allocated to single infusion of placebo or meropenem. The primary endpoint was early deterioration, defined as at least one-point increase of admission Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score the first 24 h.
resultsMost of the mortality risk was for patients with qSOFA 2 and 3. Taking the hazard ratio (HR) for death of patients with qSOFA = 1 and suPAR < 12 ng/mL as reference, the HR of qSOFA = 1 and suPAR ≥ 12 ng/mL for 28-day mortality was 2.98 (95% CI 2.11-3.96). The prospective RCT was prematurely ended due to pandemia-related ED re-allocations, with 91 patients enrolled: 47 in the placebo and 44 in the meropenem arm. The primary endpoint was met in 40.4% (n = 19) and 15.9% (n = 7), respectively (difference 24.5% [5.9-40.8]; odds ratio 0.14 [0.04-0.50]). One post hoc analysis showed significant median changes of SOFA score after 72 and 96 h equal to 0 and - 1, respectively.
conclusionsCombining qSOFA 1 with the biomarker suPAR improves its prognostic performance for unfavorable outcome and can help decision for earlier treatment. Trial registration EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT, 2018-001008-13) and Clinical-Trials.gov (NCT03717350). Registered 24 October 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.