Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38321444›Full record

Trial reportBMC oral health2024

Behavioural intervention to promote the uptake of planned care in urgent dental care attenders: a feasibility randomised controlled trial.

Rebecca Harris, V Lowers, A Best, G Burnside, J E Clarkson, C Hulme

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rebecca HarrisDepartment of Public Health, Policy and Systems, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK. harrisrv@liverpool.ac.uk.
V LowersDepartment of Public Health, Policy and Systems, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK.
A BestLiverpool Clinical Trials Centre, Clinical Directorate, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
G BurnsideDepartment of Health Data Science, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
J E ClarksonDivision of Oral Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
C HulmeHealth Economics Group, Department of Health & Community Science, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.

Funding

Programme Grants for Applied Research RP-PG-0616-20004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrgent dental care may be the only place where many people, especially vulnerable groups, access care. This presents an opportunity for delivery of a behavioural intervention promoting planned dental visiting, which may help address one of the factors contributing to a socio-economic gradient in oral health. Although we know that cueing events such as having a cancer diagnosis may create a 'teachable moment' stimulating positive changes in health behaviour, we do not know whether delivering an opportunistic intervention in urgent dental care is feasible and acceptable to patients.

methodsThe feasibility study aimed to recruit 60 patients in a Dental Hospital and dental practices delivering urgent care within and outside working hours. Follow-up was by telephone, e mail and post over 4 months.

resultsAlthough the recruitment window was shortened because of COVID-19, of 47 patients assessed for eligibility, 28 were enrolled (70.1% of screened patients provided consent). A relatively high proportion were from disadvantaged backgrounds (46.4%, 13/28 receiving State benefits). Retention was 82.1% (23/28), which was also the rate of completion of the Oral Health Impact Profile co-primary outcome. The other primary outcome involved linking participant details at recruitment, with centrally-held data on services provided, with 84.6% (22/26) records partly or fully successfully matched. All intervention participants received at least some of the intervention, although we identified aspects of dental nurse training which would improve intervention fidelity.

conclusionsDespite recruitment being impacted by the pandemic, when the majority of clinical trials experienced reduced rates of recruitment, we found a high recruitment and consenting rate, even though patients were approached opportunistically to be enrolled in the trial and potentially receive an intervention. Retention rates were also high even though a relatively high proportion had a low socio-economic background. Therefore, even though patients may be in pain, and had not anticipated involvement before their urgent care visit, the study indicated that this was a feasible and acceptable setting in which to position an opportunistic intervention. This has the potential to harness the potential of the 'teachable moment' in people's lives, and provide support to help address health inequalities.

trial registrationISRCTN 10,853,330 07/10/2019.

Indexed as

COVID-19Ambulatory CareDental CareFeasibility StudiesHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesBehaviour changeDental attendanceDental practiceInequalitiesPrimary careUrgent care

Identifiers

PMID38321444
PMCPMC10848507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.