Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38321434›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024

MAC-ErrorReads: machine learning-assisted classifier for filtering erroneous NGS reads.

Amira Sami, Sara El-Metwally, M Z Rashad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Transcriptomic Analysis ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amira SamiDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computers and Information, Mansoura University, P.O. Box: 35516, Mansoura, Egypt.
Sara El-MetwallyDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computers and Information, Mansoura University, P.O. Box: 35516, Mansoura, Egypt. sarah_almetwally4@mans.edu.eg.
M Z RashadDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computers and Information, Mansoura University, P.O. Box: 35516, Mansoura, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rapid advancement of next-generation sequencing (NGS) machines in terms of speed and affordability has led to the generation of a massive amount of biological data at the expense of data quality as errors become more prevalent. This introduces the need to utilize different approaches to detect and filtrate errors, and data quality assurance is moved from the hardware space to the software preprocessing stages.

resultsWe introduce MAC-ErrorReads, a novel Machine learning-Assisted Classifier designed for filtering Erroneous NGS Reads. MAC-ErrorReads transforms the erroneous NGS read filtration process into a robust binary classification task, employing five supervised machine learning algorithms. These models are trained on features extracted through the computation of Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF_IDF) values from various datasets such as E. coli, GAGE S. aureus, H. Chr14, Arabidopsis thaliana Chr1 and Metriaclima zebra. Notably, Naive Bayes demonstrated robust performance across various datasets, displaying high accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, MCC, and ROC values. The MAC-ErrorReads NB model accurately classified S. aureus reads, surpassing most error correction tools with a 38.69% alignment rate. For H. Chr14, tools like Lighter, Karect, CARE, Pollux, and MAC-ErrorReads showed rates above 99%. BFC and RECKONER exceeded 98%, while Fiona had 95.78%. For the Arabidopsis thaliana Chr1, Pollux, Karect, RECKONER, and MAC-ErrorReads demonstrated good alignment rates of 92.62%, 91.80%, 91.78%, and 90.87%, respectively. For the Metriaclima zebra, Pollux achieved a high alignment rate of 91.23%, despite having the lowest number of mapped reads. MAC-ErrorReads, Karect, and RECKONER demonstrated good alignment rates of 83.76%, 83.71%, and 83.67%, respectively, while also producing reasonable numbers of mapped reads to the reference genome.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that machine learning approaches for filtering NGS reads effectively identify and retain the most accurate reads, significantly enhancing assembly quality and genomic coverage. The integration of genomics and artificial intelligence through machine learning algorithms holds promise for enhancing NGS data quality, advancing downstream data analysis accuracy, and opening new opportunities in genetics, genomics, and personalized medicine research.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArtificial IntelligenceAlgorithmsBayes TheoremEscherichia coliHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMachine LearningSequence Analysis, DNASoftwareStaphylococcus aureusClassificationError filtrationFeature extractionMachine learningNext-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID38321434
PMCPMC10848413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.