Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38321416›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024

A reliable diabetic retinopathy grading via transfer learning and ensemble learning with quadratic weighted kappa metric.

Sai Venkatesh Chilukoti, Liqun Shan, Vijay Srinivas Tida, Anthony S Maida, Xiali Hei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A comprehensive review on automated diabetic retinopathy detection and classification using fundus image.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Representation Transfer of Foundation Models for Ultra-Widefield Retinal Imaging.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sai Venkatesh ChilukotiSchool of Computing and Informatics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, 70503, LA, USA.
Liqun ShanSchool of Computing and Informatics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, 70503, LA, USA.
Vijay Srinivas TidaDepartment of Computer Science, College of Saint Benedict and Saint John's University, St. Joseph, MN, 56374, USA.
Anthony S MaidaSchool of Computing and Informatics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, 70503, LA, USA.
Xiali HeiSchool of Computing and Informatics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, 70503, LA, USA. xiali.hei@louisiana.edu.

Funding

NSF National Science Foundation CNS-1650551NSF National Science Foundation CNS-2117785NSF National Science Foundation OIA-1946231NSF National Science Foundation OIA-2229752
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most common eye infection in people with diabetes is diabetic retinopathy (DR). It might cause blurred vision or even total blindness. Therefore, it is essential to promote early detection to prevent or alleviate the impact of DR. However, due to the possibility that symptoms may not be noticeable in the early stages of DR, it is difficult for doctors to identify them. Therefore, numerous predictive models based on machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have been developed to determine all stages of DR. However, existing DR classification models cannot classify every DR stage or use a computationally heavy approach. Common metrics such as accuracy, F1 score, precision, recall, and AUC-ROC score are not reliable for assessing DR grading. This is because they do not account for two key factors: the severity of the discrepancy between the assigned and predicted grades and the ordered nature of the DR grading scale. This research proposes computationally efficient ensemble methods for the classification of DR. These methods leverage pre-trained model weights, reducing training time and resource requirements. In addition, data augmentation techniques are used to address data limitations, improve features, and improve generalization. This combination offers a promising approach for accurate and robust DR grading. In particular, we take advantage of transfer learning using models trained on DR data and employ CLAHE for image enhancement and Gaussian blur for noise reduction. We propose a three-layer classifier that incorporates dropout and ReLU activation. This design aims to minimize overfitting while effectively extracting features and assigning DR grades. We prioritize the Quadratic Weighted Kappa (QWK) metric due to its sensitivity to label discrepancies, which is crucial for an accurate diagnosis of DR. This combined approach achieves state-of-the-art QWK scores (0.901, 0.967 and 0.944) in the Eyepacs, Aptos, and Messidor datasets.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic RetinopathyPhysiciansAlgorithmsHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningDiabetic retinopathy gradingEfficient netEnsemble learningQuadratic weighted kappaTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID38321416
PMCPMC11323616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.