Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38321376›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

Preconception folic acid supplementation for the prevention of birth defects: a prospective, population-based cohort study in mainland China.

Qiongjie Zhou, Guiying Dong, Qiaomei Wang, Haiping Shen, Yiping Zhang, Shikun Zhang, Jingqi Chen, Xiaotian Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A multicountry, multicenter report to identify nutritional risks in female populations using the FIGO Nutrition Checklist.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Qiongjie Zhou *Department of Obsterics, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Guiying Dong *Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Qiaomei WangNational Research Institute for Family Planning, No. 12, Dahuisi Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Haiping ShenNational Research Institute for Family Planning, No. 12, Dahuisi Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Yiping ZhangNational Research Institute for Family Planning, No. 12, Dahuisi Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Shikun ZhangNational Research Institute for Family Planning, No. 12, Dahuisi Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Jingqi Chen *Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. jingqichen@fudan.edu.cn.
Xiaotian Li *Department of Obsterics, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China. xiaotianli555@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFolic acid supplementation is recommended for reducing the risk of birth defects. We aimed to assess the protective association of periconception folic acid supplements with birth defects in real-world setting.

methodsThis prospective, population-based cohort study utilized national preconception registered data of married Chinese couples planning a pregnancy within 6 months between 2010 and 2012 in Mainland China. Participated women are freely provided folic acid starting 3 months before conception till 3 months after conception. Birth defects were self-reported at 42 days postpartumn followup. R software (v4.0.2) was applied for statistical analyses.

resultsComplete data of 567,547 couples with pregnancy outcomes and folic acid supplementation were extracted for final analysis. A total of 74.7% women were with folic acid supplementation, and 599 birth defects were self-reported. The odd of birth defects was lower among women taking folic acid compared to their counterparts not taking (0.102% vs 0.116%, P < 0.001). In the multiple logistic regression analyses, the odd of birth defects was lower among couples with maternal folic acid supplementation (OR = 0.78, 95%CI: 0.66-0.95, P = 0.011), especially decreased odd of neural tube defects (NTDs) (OR = 0.56, 95%CI: 0.39-0.82, P = 0.003). This association was confirmed by 1:4 and 1:10 case control analysis. Odds of birth defects were significantly lower among women with folic acid supplementation more than 3 months before pregnancy (P < 0.001), and moreover, the odds of cleft (P = 0.007) and NTDs (P = 0.007) were of notable decrease.

conclusionThis retrospective case cohort study provides programmatic evidence for public health strategy-making to for reducing the risk of NTDs and clefts.

Indexed as

Folic AcidNeural Tube DefectsChinaCohort StudiesDietary SupplementsFemaleHumansMalePregnancyProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesFolic AcidBirth defectsChinaClefts, congenital heart diseaseFolic acid supplementationNeural tubal defects

Identifiers

PMID38321376
PMCPMC10845381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.