Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38321371›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2024

Ancestral alleles defined for 70 million cattle variants using a population-based likelihood ratio test.

Jigme Dorji, Antonio Reverter, Pamela A Alexandre, Amanda J Chamberlain, Christy J Vander-Jagt, James Kijas, Laercio R Porto-Neto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jigme DorjiCSIRO, Agriculture & Food, St. Lucia, QLD, 4067, Australia. Jigme.Dorji@csiro.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4057-8918
Antonio ReverterCSIRO, Agriculture & Food, St. Lucia, QLD, 4067, Australia.
Pamela A AlexandreCSIRO, Agriculture & Food, St. Lucia, QLD, 4067, Australia.
Amanda J ChamberlainAgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Agriculture Victoria, Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia.
Christy J Vander-JagtAgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Agriculture Victoria, Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia.
James KijasCSIRO, Agriculture & Food, St. Lucia, QLD, 4067, Australia.
Laercio R Porto-NetoCSIRO, Agriculture & Food, St. Lucia, QLD, 4067, Australia.

Funding

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation R-18352-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study of ancestral alleles provides insights into the evolutionary history, selection, and genetic structures of a population. In cattle, ancestral alleles are widely used in genetic analyses, including the detection of signatures of selection, determination of breed ancestry, and identification of admixture. Having a comprehensive list of ancestral alleles is expected to improve the accuracy of these genetic analyses. However, the list of ancestral alleles in cattle, especially at the whole genome sequence level, is far from complete. In fact, the current largest list of ancestral alleles (~ 42 million) represents less than 28% of the total number of detected variants in cattle. To address this issue and develop a genomic resource for evolutionary studies, we determined ancestral alleles in cattle by comparing prior derived whole-genome sequence variants to an out-species group using a population-based likelihood ratio test.

resultsOur study determined and makes available the largest list of ancestral alleles in cattle to date (70.1 million) and includes 2.3 million on the X chromosome. There was high concordance (97.6%) of the determined ancestral alleles with those from previous studies when only high-probability ancestral alleles were considered (29.8 million positions) and another 23.5 million high-confidence ancestral alleles were novel, expanding the available reference list to improve the accuracies of genetic analyses involving ancestral alleles. The high concordance of the results with previous studies implies that our approach using genomic sequence variants and a likelihood ratio test to determine ancestral alleles is appropriate.

conclusionsConsidering the high concordance of ancestral alleles across studies, the ancestral alleles determined in this study including those not previously listed, particularly those with high-probability estimates, may be used for further genetic analyses with reasonable accuracy. Our approach that used predetermined variants in species and the likelihood ratio test to determine ancestral alleles is applicable to other species for which sequence level genotypes are available.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsAllelesAnimalsCattleGenotypeLikelihood FunctionsPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID38321371
PMCPMC10848479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.