ArticleVeterinary research communications2024
Antibacterial activity of plant-derived compounds and cream formulations against canine skin bacteria.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coffee Cascara as a Source of Natural Antimicrobials: Chemical Characterization and Activity Against ESKAPE Pathogens.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Lapatinib-Loaded ZIF‑8 Nanoparticles: A Multifunctional Drug Delivery System with Anticancer, Antibacterial, and Antioxidant Properties.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Topical Delivery Systems for Plant-Derived Antimicrobial Agents: A Review of Current Advances.International journal of biomaterials · 2025Review
- EndophyticInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An urgent need to find alternative antimicrobial compounds effective in the prevention and treatment of skin infections led us to study the inhibitory activity of eight plant-derived bioactive compounds (betulin, curcumin, glycyrrhizic acid, guaiazulene, piperine, quercetin, quinine, tannic acid) against 14 canine skin isolates (11 Gram-positive and three Gram-negative bacteria) selected based on antibiotic resistance and virulence features. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) were determined using the broth microdilution method. In detail, the results for the eight different plant compounds showed their inhibitory activity in the concentration range from 0.04 to more than 16 mg/ml (MIC) and from 0.25 to more than 16 mg/ml (MBC). The most potent compounds appear to be tannic acid, followed by quinine and curcumin (MIC 0.04-16.0 mg/ml). The most susceptible strain to the tested agents in general was Bacillus cereus AE13, while Enterococcus faecium AA14 was the most resistant strain (the highest MICs) among the tested bacteria. The two most potent plant-derived compounds (tannic acid and quinine) were tested in mixture in different ratios (1:1, 1:2, 2:1). The lowest MIC and MBC values were observed for the 1:2 ratio, which was used for preparation of creams with different cream bases. One of the cream formulations (cream F) was effective up to 63.0 mg/ml (MIC) with a microbial inactivation time of 1-6 h according to the tested strain. This study provides evidence that some plant-derived compounds could have an antimicrobial effect against canine skin bacteria, the strength of which is bacterial strain dependent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.