Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38321327›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2024

Deep learning for differentiation of osteolytic osteosarcoma and giant cell tumor around the knee joint on radiographs: a multicenter study.

Jingjing Shao, Hongxin Lin, Lei Ding, Bing Li, Danyang Xu, Yang Sun, Tianming Guan, Haiyang Dai, Ruihao Liu, Demao Deng and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jingjing Shao *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Hongxin Lin *Medical AI Lab, School of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Centre, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Lei DingDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Bing LiMedical AI Lab, School of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Centre, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Danyang XuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yang SunDepartment of Radiology, Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Tianming GuanDepartment of Radiology, Hui Ya Hospital of The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Huizhou, Guangdong, China.
Haiyang DaiDepartment of Radiology, People's Hospital of Huizhou City Center, Huizhou, Guangdong, China.
Ruihao LiuMedical AI Lab, School of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Centre, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Demao DengDepartment of Radiology, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guanxi Academy of Medical Science, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Bingsheng HuangMedical AI Lab, School of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Centre, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Shiting FengDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. fengsht@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Xianfen DiaoNational-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, School of Medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China. laodiao@szu.edu.cn.
Zhenhua GaoDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. gaozhh@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6254-8707

Funding

Medical Science and Technology Foundation of Guangdong Province No.A2021010Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province NO.2022A1515011593Shenzhen Municipal Scheme for Basic Research JCYJ20210324100208022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop a deep learning (DL) model for differentiating between osteolytic osteosarcoma (OS) and giant cell tumor (GCT) on radiographs.

methodsPatients with osteolytic OS and GCT proven by postoperative pathology were retrospectively recruited from four centers (center A, training and internal testing; centers B, C, and D, external testing). Sixteen radiologists with different experiences in musculoskeletal imaging diagnosis were divided into three groups and participated with or without the DL model's assistance. DL model was generated using EfficientNet-B6 architecture, and the clinical model was trained using clinical variables. The performance of various models was compared using McNemar's test.

resultsThree hundred thirty-three patients were included (mean age, 27 years ± 12 [SD]; 186 men). Compared to the clinical model, the DL model achieved a higher area under the curve (AUC) in both the internal (0.97 vs. 0.77, p = 0.008) and external test set (0.97 vs. 0.64, p < 0.001). In the total test set (including the internal and external test sets), the DL model achieved higher accuracy than the junior expert committee (93.1% vs. 72.4%; p < 0.001) and was comparable to the intermediate and senior expert committee (93.1% vs. 88.8%, p = 0.25; 87.1%, p = 0.35). With DL model assistance, the accuracy of the junior expert committee was improved from 72.4% to 91.4% (p = 0.051).

conclusionThe DL model accurately distinguished osteolytic OS and GCT with better performance than the junior radiologists, whose own diagnostic performances were significantly improved with the aid of the model, indicating the potential for the differential diagnosis of the two bone tumors on radiographs. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The deep learning model can accurately distinguish osteolytic osteosarcoma and giant cell tumor on radiographs, which may help radiologists improve the diagnostic accuracy of two types of tumors. KEY POINTS: • The DL model shows robust performance in distinguishing osteolytic osteosarcoma and giant cell tumor. • The diagnosis performance of the DL model is better than junior radiologists'. • The DL model shows potential for differentiating osteolytic osteosarcoma and giant cell tumor.

Indexed as

Bone neoplasmsDeep learningKnee jointRadiography

Identifiers

PMID38321327
PMCPMC10847082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.