Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38321287›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2024

[Migraine and pregnancy : Gender-specific aspects and current knowledge].

Bianca Raffaelli, Kristin S Lange

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bianca RaffaelliKopfschmerzzentrum, Klinik für Neurologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland. bianca.raffaelli@charite.de.
Kristin S LangeKopfschmerzzentrum, Klinik für Neurologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMigraine, a frequent and debilitating neurological disease, shows gender-specific differences in prevalence and severity. Pregnancy is associated with numerous unique features in terms of migraine course, treatment options and differential diagnoses.

objectivesHow does pregnancy influence the course of migraine? What are the possible treatment options during pregnancy? Which differential diagnoses should be considered? MATERIAL AND

methodsNarrative review with summary and discussion of relevant studies and guidelines on migraine in pregnancy.

resultsDuring pregnancy up to three quarters of women experience improvement of their migraine; however, there may be a renewed increase in frequency after childbirth. Choosing an appropriate treatment during pregnancy requires a careful risk-benefit assessment. It is important to consider secondary causes of headache as these can occur more frequently during pregnancy and some can be life-threatening.

conclusionConsideration of specific aspects of migraine in pregnancy is crucial to be able to develop the best possible treatment strategies for affected patients.

Indexed as

Migraine DisordersNervous System DiseasesFemaleHeadacheHumansPregnancyRisk AssessmentDifferential diagnosesHeadacheSecondary causes of headacheSex hormonesTreatment options

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.