ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2024
Metabolic bone disease of prematurity screening and individualized enteral mineral supplementation in high-risk neonates: a quality improvement initiative.
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Biomarkers of phosphate homeostasis and metabolic bone disease of prematurity: impact of early nutrition and regulation by vitamin D, iPTH, PTHrP, and FGF23.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Article
- Interventions for metabolic bone disease of prematurity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Metabolism open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePrompted by an alarmingly low screening rate for metabolic bone disease of prematurity (MBDP), we aimed to increase MBDP screening with serum calcium, phosphorous, and alkaline phosphatase at four to six weeks of life in infants born at <1500 g and <32 gestational weeks from a baseline of 27.37% to 90% within one year. STUDY
designWe used the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Model for Improvement as a framework. A key driver diagram informed the interventions which were carried out through four Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles.
resultsThere were 129 and 130 neonates in the pre-intervention baseline group and post-intervention MBDP bundle group, respectively. MBDP bundled primary screening rates increased from 27.37% to 95.56% (p < 0.001). Furthermore, 20% of infants had an individualized change in their enteral mineral supplementation after the initiative.
conclusionsAn interdisciplinary team-based quality improvement approach was effective in altering clinical practice to improve screening and subsequent treatment for MBDP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38321167What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.