Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38321086›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Proportional impact prediction model of coating material on nitrate leaching of slow-release Urea Super Granules (USG) using machine learning and RSM technique.

Sidhartha Sekhar Swain, Tapan Kumar Khura, Pramod Kumar Sahoo, Kapil Atmaram Chobhe, Nadhir Al-Ansari, Hari Lal Kushwaha, Nand Lal Kushwaha, Kanhu Charan Panda, Satish Devram Lande, Chandu Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sidhartha Sekhar SwainDivision of Agricultural Engineering, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Tapan Kumar KhuraDivision of Agricultural Engineering, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Pramod Kumar SahooDivision of Agricultural Engineering, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Kapil Atmaram ChobheDivision of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Nadhir Al-AnsariDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Lulea University of Technology, 97187, Lulea, Sweden. nadhir.alansari@ltu.se.
Hari Lal KushwahaDivision of Agricultural Engineering, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Nand Lal KushwahaDivision of Agricultural Engineering, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Kanhu Charan PandaDepartment of Soil Conservation, National PG College (Barhalganj), DDU Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur, UP, 273402, India.
Satish Devram LandeDivision of Agricultural Engineering, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Chandu SinghDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An accurate assessment of nitrate leaching is important for efficient fertiliser utilisation and groundwater pollution reduction. However, past studies could not efficiently model nitrate leaching due to utilisation of conventional algorithms. To address the issue, the current research employed advanced machine learning algorithms, viz., Support Vector Machine, Artificial Neural Network, Random Forest, M5 Tree (M5P), Reduced Error Pruning Tree (REPTree) and Response Surface Methodology (RSM) to predict and optimize nitrate leaching. In this study, Urea Super Granules (USG) with three different coatings were used for the experiment in the soil columns, containing 1 kg soil with fertiliser placed in between. Statistical parameters, namely correlation coefficient, Mean Absolute Error, Willmott index, Root Mean Square Error and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency were used to evaluate the performance of the ML techniques. In addition, a comparison was made in the test set among the machine learning models in which, RSM outperformed the rest of the models irrespective of coating type. Neem oil/ Acacia oil(ml): clay/sulfer (g): age (days) for minimum nitrate leaching was found to be 2.61: 1.67: 2.4 for coating of USG with bentonite clay and neem oil without heating, 2.18: 2: 1 for bentonite clay and neem oil with heating and 1.69: 1.64: 2.18 for coating USG with sulfer and acacia oil. The research would provide guidelines to researchers and policymakers to select the appropriate tool for precise prediction of nitrate leaching, which would optimise the yield and the benefit-cost ratio.

Identifiers

PMID38321086
PMCPMC10847469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.