Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38321085›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Reliability of patient-specific gait profiles with inertial measurement units during the 2-min walk test in incomplete spinal cord injury.

Romina Willi, Charlotte Werner, László Demkó, Rob de Bie, Linard Filli, Björn Zörner, Armin Curt, Marc Bolliger

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04555759 (Validity and Reliability of the 2-minute Walk Test in Individuals With a Spinal Cord Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04555759 nacompletednot on this map

Validity and Reliability of the 2-minute Walk Test in Individuals With a Spinal Cord Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ZurichRan2020 to 2021Enrolled50ConditionsSpinal Cord InjuriesArms2-minute walk test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Gait analysis methods in people with spinal cord injury: a systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Romina WilliSpinal Cord Injury Centre Balgrist, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Charlotte WernerSpinal Cord Injury Centre Balgrist, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
László DemkóSpinal Cord Injury Centre Balgrist, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Rob de BieDepartment of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Linard FilliSpinal Cord Injury Centre Balgrist, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Björn ZörnerSpinal Cord Injury Centre Balgrist, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Armin CurtSpinal Cord Injury Centre Balgrist, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Marc BolligerSpinal Cord Injury Centre Balgrist, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland. marc.bolliger@balgrist.ch.

Funding

International Foundation for Research in Paraplegia P183Wings for Life WFL-CH-029/17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most established clinical walking tests assess specific aspects of movement function (velocity, endurance, etc.) but are generally unable to determine specific biomechanical or neurological deficits that limit an individual's ability to walk. Recently, inertial measurement units (IMU) have been used to collect objective kinematic data for gait analysis and could be a valuable extension for clinical assessments (e.g., functional walking measures). This study assesses the reliability of an IMU-based overground gait analysis during the 2-min walk test (2mWT) in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Furthermore, the study elaborates on the capability of IMUs to distinguish between different gait characteristics in individuals with SCI. Twenty-six individuals (aged 22-79) with acute or chronic SCI (AIS: C and D) completed the 2mWT with IMUs attached above each ankle on 2 test days, separated by 1 to 7 days. The IMU-based gait analysis showed good to excellent test-retest reliability (ICC: 0.77-0.99) for all gait parameters. Gait profiles remained stable between two measurements. Sensor-based gait profiling was able to reveal patient-specific gait impairments even in individuals with the same walking performance in the 2mWT. IMUs are a valuable add-on to clinical gait assessments and deliver reliable information on detailed gait pathologies in individuals with SCI.Trial registration: NCT04555759.

Indexed as

GaitSpinal Cord InjuriesHumansReproducibility of ResultsWalkingWalk Test

Identifiers

PMID38321085
PMCPMC10847409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.