Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38321025›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

SQM2.20: Semiempirical quantum-mechanical scoring function yields DFT-quality protein-ligand binding affinity predictions in minutes.

Adam Pecina, Jindřich Fanfrlík, Martin Lepšík, Jan Řezáč

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. On-Resin Assembly of Macrocyclic Inhibitors ofJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Need for Continuing Blinded Pose- and Activity Prediction Benchmarks.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adam Pecina *Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-3890-7831
Jindřich Fanfrlík *Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-1257-1201
Martin LepšíkInstitute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan ŘezáčInstitute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic. rezac@uochb.cas.cz.ORCID 0000-0001-6849-7314

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate estimation of protein-ligand binding affinity is the cornerstone of computer-aided drug design. We present a universal physics-based scoring function, named SQM2.20, addressing key terms of binding free energy using semiempirical quantum-mechanical computational methods. SQM2.20 incorporates the latest methodological advances while remaining computationally efficient even for systems with thousands of atoms. To validate it rigorously, we have compiled and made available the PL-REX benchmark dataset consisting of high-resolution crystal structures and reliable experimental affinities for ten diverse protein targets. Comparative assessments demonstrate that SQM2.20 outperforms other scoring methods and reaches a level of accuracy similar to much more expensive DFT calculations. In the PL-REX dataset, it achieves excellent correlation with experimental data (average R

Indexed as

Drug DesignProteinsLigandsProtein BindingThermodynamicsLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID38321025
PMCPMC10847445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.