Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38320841›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Empowering Ontario's long-term care residents to shape the place they call home: a codesign protocol.

Chloe Lee, Dee Tripp, Melissa McVie, Julia Fineczko, Gale Ramsden, Sobhneek Hothi, Jennifer Langston, Jim Gilhuly, Beryl Collingwood, Carrie McAiney and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Chloe LeeOntario Association of Residents' Councils, Markham, Ontario, Canada clee@ontarc.com.ORCID 0009-0000-0290-575X
Dee TrippOntario Association of Residents' Councils, Markham, Ontario, Canada.
Melissa McVieOntario Association of Residents' Councils, Markham, Ontario, Canada.
Julia FineczkoLawrence Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gale RamsdenOntario Association of Residents' Councils, Markham, Ontario, Canada.
Sobhneek HothiUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0724-4759
Jennifer LangstonOntario Association of Residents' Councils, Markham, Ontario, Canada.
Jim GilhulyOntario Association of Residents' Councils, Markham, Ontario, Canada.
Beryl CollingwoodOntario Association of Residents' Councils, Markham, Ontario, Canada.
Carrie McAineySchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7864-344X
Katherine S McGiltonLawrence Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer BethellKITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6141-9011

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCanada's long-term care (LTC) homes were founded on an institutional model that viewed residents as passive recipients of care. Many homes continue to follow this model leaving residents removed from operational decision-making within their homes. However, involving residents in the design of their LTC home's environment, programmes and operations can improve the residents' quality of life and other outcomes. This codesign project creates a toolkit/resource for LTC homes to facilitate meaningful resident engagement in their home's organisational design and governance.

methodThis three-part project consists of a scoping review, qualitative interviews, toolkit/resource development and prototyping. In part 1, we conduct a scoping review to synthesise existing knowledge on approaches to engaging LTC home residents in organisational design and governance of their LTC homes, as well as explore barriers, challenges and facilitators of engagement, considerations for diversity and cognitive change, and approaches to evaluation. In part 2, we will have interviews and focus groups with residents, team members (staff) and administrators to assess community capacity to implement and sustain a programme to engage LTC residents in organisational design and governance of their LTC homes. The third part of our project uses these findings to help codesign toolkit(s)/resource(s) to enable the engagement of LTC residents in the organisational design and governance of their LTC homes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The project is conducted in partnership with the Ontario Association of Residents' Councils. We will leverage their communication to disseminate findings and support the use of the codesigned toolkit(s)/resource(S) with knowledge users. We will also publish the study results in an academic journal and present at conferences, webinars and workshops. These results can influence practices within LTC homes by inspiring an organisational culture where residents help shape the place they call home. The interviews and focus groups, conducted in part 2, have been submitted to the University Health Network Research Ethics Board.

Indexed as

Long-Term CareQuality of LifeHumansOntarioPalliative CarePower, PsychologicalReview Literature as TopicAgingGERIATRIC MEDICINEPatient-Centered CareQuality in health care

Identifiers

PMID38320841
PMCPMC10860031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.