Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38320840›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Implementation of rapid genomic sequencing in safety-net neonatal intensive care units: protocol for the VIrtual GenOme CenteR (VIGOR) proof-of-concept study.

Alissa M D'Gama, Sonia Hills, Jessica Douglas, Vanessa Young, Casie A Genetti, Monica H Wojcik, Henry A Feldman, Timothy W Yu, Margaret G Parker, Pankaj B Agrawal and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05205356 (VIGOR), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05205356 active not recruitingnot on this map

VIGOR: Virtual Genome Center for Infant Health

TypeobservationalSponsorBoston Children's HospitalRan2022 to 2027Enrolled631ConditionsGenetics Disease, Genetics/Birth Defects, Genetic Predisposition to Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Rapid genomic sequencing in the NICU: Who to test and why.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Understanding perspectives of safety-net NICU neonatologists disclosing genomic sequencing results: a mixed methods approach.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. "It's hard to wait": Provider perspectives on current genomic care in safety-net NICUs.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alissa M D'Gama *Division of Newborn Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sonia Hills *Division of Genetics and Genomics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5302-3236
Jessica DouglasDivision of Genetics and Genomics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Vanessa YoungDivision of Newborn Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Casie A GenettiDivision of Genetics and Genomics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Monica H WojcikDivision of Newborn Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Henry A FeldmanDivision of Newborn Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Timothy W YuDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Margaret G Parker *UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Pankaj B Agrawal *Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA pagrawal@miami.edu.
VIGOR Network
Boston Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

Genetic Analysis and Manipulation Core (GAEC)P50HD105351 · NICHD · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI Hisashi Umemori · 2021 to 2026
$9.4M
VIGOR: Virtual Genome Center for Infant HealthR01HG011798 · NHGRI · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI AGRAWAL, PANKAJ B, PARKER, MARGARET GRAHAM KEMPER · 2021 to 2025
$5.1M
Neonatal Research Training ProgramT32HD098061 · NICHD · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI Stella Kourembanas, Martha C. Sola-Visner · 2019 to 2026
$4.0M
The Burden of Genetic Disorders in Infant MortalityK23HD102589 · NICHD · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI WOJCIK, MONICA HSIUNG · 2020 to 2024
$840k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG011798NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD102589NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD105351NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD098061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRapid genomic sequencing (rGS) in critically ill infants with suspected genetic disorders has high diagnostic and clinical utility. However, rGS has primarily been available at large referral centres with the resources and expertise to offer state-of-the-art genomic care. Critically ill infants from racial and ethnic minority and/or low-income populations disproportionately receive care in safety-net and/or community settings lacking access to state-of-the-art genomic care, contributing to unacceptable health equity gaps. VIrtual GenOme CenteR is a 'proof-of-concept' implementation science study of an innovative delivery model for genomic care in safety-net neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We developed a virtual genome centre at a referral centre to remotely support safety-net NICU sites predominantly serving racial and ethnic minority and/or low-income populations and have limited to no access to rGS. Neonatal providers at each site receive basic education about genomic medicine from the study team and identify eligible infants. The study team enrols eligible infants (goal n of 250) and their parents and follows families for 12 months. Enrolled infants receive rGS, the study team creates clinical interpretive reports to guide neonatal providers on interpreting results, and neonatal providers return results to families. Data is collected via (1) medical record abstraction, (2) surveys, interviews and focus groups with neonatal providers and (3) surveys and interviews with families. We aim to examine comprehensive implementation outcomes based on the Proctor Implementation Framework using a mixed methods approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is approved by the institutional review board of Boston Children's Hospital (IRB-P00040496) and participating sites. Participating families are required to provide electronic written informed consent and neonatal provider consent is implied through the completion of surveys. The results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and data will be made accessible per National Institutes of Health (NIH) policies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05205356/clinicaltrials.gov.

Indexed as

EthnicityIntensive Care Units, NeonatalChildCritical IllnessGenomicsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMinority GroupsGENETICSHealth EquityHealth Services AccessibilityNeonatal intensive & critical careNEONATOLOGYPaediatric clinical genetics & dysmorphology

Identifiers

PMID38320840
PMCPMC10859977
OpenAlexW4391577912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.