ArticleLipids2024
Alteration of serum bile acids in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Article in Lipids, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emerging Roles of Bile Acids in Neuroinflammation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Emerging Roles of Bile Acids and TGR5 in the Central Nervous System: Molecular Functions and Therapeutic Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Bile Acids as Key Mediators of the Gut Microbiota-Immune Axis: Potential Biomarker and Therapeutic Perspectives.BioFactors (Oxford, England)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Hydrophilic endogenous bile acids ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA), and glucourosodeoxycholic acid (GUDCA) have suggested neuroprotective effects. We performed a case-control study to examine the association between ALS diagnosis and serum levels of bile acids. Sporadic and familial ALS patients, age- and sex-matched healthy controls, and presymptomatic gene carriers who donated blood samples were included. Non-fasted serum samples stored at -80°C were used for the analysis. Serum bile acid levels were measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Concentrations of 15 bile acids were obtained, 5 non-conjugated and 10 conjugated, and compared between ALS versus control groups (presymptomatic gene carriers + healthy controls) using the Wilcoxon-Rank-Sum test. In total, 80 participants were included: 31 ALS (17 sporadic and 14 familial ALS); 49 controls (22 gene carriers, 27 healthy controls). The mean age was 50 years old and 50% were male. In the ALS group, 45% had familial disease with a pathogenic variant in C9orf72 (29%), TARDBP (10%), FUS (3%), and CHCHD10 (3%) genes. In the control group, 43% carried pathogenic variants: C9orf72 (27%), SOD1 (10%), and FUS (6%). The serum levels of UDCA, TUDCA, and GUDCA trended higher in the ALS group compared to controls (median 27 vs. 7 nM, 4 vs. 3 nM, 110 vs. 47 nM, p-values 0.04, 0.06, 0.04, respectively). No significant group differences were found in other bile acids serum levels. In conclusion, the serum level of UDCA, TUDCA, GUDCA trended higher in ALS patients compared to controls, and no evidence of deficiencies was found.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.