Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38320631›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of pathology2024

Model-Agnostic Binary Patch Grouping for Bone Marrow Whole Slide Image Representation.

Youqing Mu, Hamid R Tizhoosh, Taher Dehkharghanian, Saghir Alfasly, Clinton J V Campbell

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hematopathology Practice in the Digital Era: What has Changed?International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Youqing MuDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Hamid R TizhooshRhazes Lab, Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Taher DehkharghanianDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Department of Nephrology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Saghir AlfaslyRhazes Lab, Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Clinton J V CampbellDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: campbecj@mcmaster.ca.
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USUniversity of Toronto · CAUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histopathology is the reference standard for pathology diagnosis, and has evolved with the digitization of glass slides [ie, whole slide images (WSIs)]. While trained histopathologists are able to diagnose diseases by examining WSIs visually, this process is time consuming and prone to variability. To address these issues, artificial intelligence models are being developed to generate slide-level representations of WSIs, summarizing the entire slide as a single vector. This enables various computational pathology applications, including interslide search, multimodal training, and slide-level classification. Achieving expressive and robust slide-level representations hinges on patch feature extraction and aggregation steps. This study proposed an additional binary patch grouping (BPG) step, a plugin that can be integrated into various slide-level representation pipelines, to enhance the quality of slide-level representation in bone marrow histopathology. BPG excludes patches with less clinical relevance through minimal interaction with the pathologist; a one-time human intervention for the entire process. This study further investigated domain-general versus domain-specific feature extraction models based on convolution and attention and examined two different feature aggregation methods, with and without BPG, showing BPG's generalizability. The results showed that using BPG boosts the performance of WSI retrieval (mean average precision at 10) by 4% and improves WSI classification (weighted-F1) by 5% compared to not using BPG. Additionally, domain-general large models and parameterized pooling produced the best-quality slide-level representations.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBone MarrowDietary SupplementsHumansPathologists

Identifiers

PMID38320631
PMCPMC12178382
OpenAlexW4391539851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.