ArticleThe American journal of pathology2024
Model-Agnostic Binary Patch Grouping for Bone Marrow Whole Slide Image Representation.
Article in The American journal of pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hematopathology Practice in the Digital Era: What has Changed?International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026Review
- Deep learning framework for predicting EGFR mutation status from H&E whole slide images in lung adenocarcinoma.BMC cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Histopathology is the reference standard for pathology diagnosis, and has evolved with the digitization of glass slides [ie, whole slide images (WSIs)]. While trained histopathologists are able to diagnose diseases by examining WSIs visually, this process is time consuming and prone to variability. To address these issues, artificial intelligence models are being developed to generate slide-level representations of WSIs, summarizing the entire slide as a single vector. This enables various computational pathology applications, including interslide search, multimodal training, and slide-level classification. Achieving expressive and robust slide-level representations hinges on patch feature extraction and aggregation steps. This study proposed an additional binary patch grouping (BPG) step, a plugin that can be integrated into various slide-level representation pipelines, to enhance the quality of slide-level representation in bone marrow histopathology. BPG excludes patches with less clinical relevance through minimal interaction with the pathologist; a one-time human intervention for the entire process. This study further investigated domain-general versus domain-specific feature extraction models based on convolution and attention and examined two different feature aggregation methods, with and without BPG, showing BPG's generalizability. The results showed that using BPG boosts the performance of WSI retrieval (mean average precision at 10) by 4% and improves WSI classification (weighted-F1) by 5% compared to not using BPG. Additionally, domain-general large models and parameterized pooling produced the best-quality slide-level representations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.