Trial reportNEJM evidence2023
A Randomized Trial of Nafamostat for Covid-19.
Trial report in NEJM evidence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04483960 (A Multi-centre Randomised Adaptive Platform Clinical Trial to Assess Clinical, Virological and Immunological Outcomes in Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multi-centre Randomised Adaptive Platform Clinical Trial to Assess Clinical, Virological and Immunological Outcomes in Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection (COVID-19)
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hitting Coronaviruses Where It Hurts: Antiviral Strategies Targeting Viral Proteins.ChemMedChem · 2026Review
- Discovery of Highly Selective Noncovalent Macrocyclic Peptide Inhibitors Suppressing Both TMPRSS2 Protease Activity and Viral Receptor Function.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Lock out: targeting TMPRSS2 to block influenza and coronaviruses.Journal of virology · 2026Review
- Targeting SARS-CoV-2 Structural and Accessory Proteins: Emerging Opportunities for Small-Molecule Coronavirus Antivirals.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Pharmacokinetics and safety of nafamostat and its metabolites following single- and multiple-dose oral administration of nafamostat mesylate in healthy male participants.Translational and clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Searching for Novel Antiviral Agents as COVID19 Treatments: Guanidino Diaryl Thioureas.ChemMedChem · 2026Article
- Monoclonal antibodies against human TMPRSS2 prevent infection by any SARS-CoV-2 variant.iScience · 2025Article
- Clinical Outcomes of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Use in Patients With Intracranial Hemorrhage.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Article
- An orally available MNature communications · 2025Article
- From N-0385 to N-0920: Unveiling a Host-Directed Protease Inhibitor with Picomolar Antiviral Efficacy against Prevalent SARS-CoV-2 Variants.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- Prior Ground: Selection of Prior Distributions When Analyzing Clinical Trial Data Using Bayesian Methods.NEJM evidence · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
64 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNafamostat mesylate is a potent in vitro antiviral agent that inhibits the host transmembrane protease serine 2 enzyme used by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 for cell entry.
methodsThis open-label, pragmatic, randomized clinical trial in Australia, New Zealand, and Nepal included noncritically ill hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). Participants were randomly assigned to usual care or usual care plus nafamostat. The primary end point was death (any cause) or receipt of new invasive or noninvasive ventilation or vasopressor support within 28 days after randomization. Analysis was with a Bayesian logistic model in which an adjusted odds ratio <1.0 indicates improved outcomes with nafamostat. Enrollment was closed due to falling numbers of eligible patients.
resultsWe screened 647 patients in 21 hospitals (15 in Australia, 4 in New Zealand, and 2 in Nepal) and enrolled 160 participants from May 2021 to August 2022. In the intention-to-treat population, the primary end point occurred in 8 (11%) of 73 patients with usual care and 4 (5%) of 82 with nafamostat. The median adjusted odds ratio for the primary end point for nafamostat was 0.40 (95% credible interval, 0.12 to 1.34) with a posterior probability of effectiveness (adjusted odds ratio <1.0) of 93%. For usual care compared with nafamostat, hyperkalemia occurred in 1 (1%) of 67 and 7 (9%) of 78 participants, respectively, and clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 1 (1%) of 73 and 7 (8%) of 82 participants.
conclusionsAmong hospitalized patients with Covid-19, there was a 93% posterior probability that nafamostat reduced the odds of death or organ support. Prespecified stopping criteria were not met, precluding definitive conclusions. Hyperkalemia and bleeding were more common with nafamostat. (Funded by ASCOT and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04483960.)
Indexed as
Identifiers
38320527What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.