ReviewCurrent biology : CB2024
Synaptic promiscuity in brain development.
Review in Current biology : CB, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Population morphology implies a common developmental blueprint for Drosophila motion detectors.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Competitive Olivocerebellar Input Selection Promotes Resilient Circuit Formation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Stereotypical interciliary contacts in abioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Sequential formation ofScience advances · 2026Article
- Imprecision in Vision: Lessons From Neural Circuits in the Fly.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Semi-automatic geometrical reconstruction and analysis of filopodia dynamics in 4D two-photon microscopy images.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Synaptic Cell Adhesion: A Functional Perspective.Advances in neurobiology · 2026Review
- Population Morphology Implies a Common Developmental Blueprint forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Brain-wide mapping of developmental trajectories of cerebellar efferent projections.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Spatial constraints and cell surface molecule depletion structure a randomly connected learning circuit.Current biology : CB · 2025Article
- Expanding ligand-receptor interaction networks for axon guidance: Structural insights into signal crosstalk and specificity.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2025Review
- Nervous system-wide analysis of allScience advances · 2025Article
- GLP-1/GLP-1R axis: from metabolism (obesity and T2DM) to immunity.Open biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precise synaptic connectivity is a prerequisite for the function of neural circuits, yet individual neurons, taken out of their developmental context, readily form unspecific synapses. How does the genome encode brain wiring in light of this apparent contradiction? Synaptic specificity is the outcome of a long series of developmental processes and mechanisms before, during and after synapse formation. How much promiscuity is permissible or necessary at the moment of synaptic partner choice depends on the extent to which prior development restricts available partners or subsequent development corrects initially made synapses. Synaptic promiscuity at the moment of choice can thereby play important roles in the development of precise connectivity, but also facilitate developmental flexibility and robustness. In this review, we assess the experimental evidence for the prevalence and roles of promiscuous synapse formation during brain development. Many well-established experimental approaches are based on developmental genetic perturbation and an assessment of synaptic connectivity only in the adult; this can make it difficult to pinpoint when a given defect or mechanism occurred. In many cases, such studies reveal mechanisms that restrict partner availability already prior to synapse formation. Subsequently, at the moment of choice, factors including synaptic competency, interaction dynamics and molecular recognition further restrict synaptic partners. The discussion of the development of synaptic specificity through the lens of synaptic promiscuity suggests an algorithmic process based on neurons capable of promiscuous synapse formation that are continuously prevented from making the wrong choices, with no single mechanism or developmental time point sufficient to explain the outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.