Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38319952›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Towards improving online learning in physical education: Gender differences and determinants of motivation, psychological needs satisfaction, and academic achievement in Saudi students.

Mohamed Frikha, Nourhen Mezghanni, Nesrine Chaâri, Noureddine Ben Said, Mohammed S Alibrahim, Majed M Alhumaid, Marwa M Hassan, Raghad S Alharbi, Mostafa S Amira, Nasser Abouzeid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mohamed FrikhaDepartment of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6744-7179
Nourhen MezghanniDepartment of Sport Sciences, College of Education, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Nesrine ChaâriResearch Laboratory Education, Motricity, Sport and Health (LR19JS01), High Institute of Sport and Physical Education, Sfax University, Sfax, Tunisia.ORCID 0000-0002-9573-9136
Noureddine Ben SaidDepartment of Biomechanics and Motor Behavior, College of Sport Sciences and Physical Activity, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0712-1249
Mohammed S AlibrahimDepartment of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9141-3470
Majed M AlhumaidDepartment of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-3829-4476
Marwa M HassanDepartment of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-3391-2722
Raghad S AlharbiDepartment of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Mostafa S AmiraDepartment of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2074-0412
Nasser AbouzeidDepartment of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies on students' perceptions and expectations during physical education (PE) online learning remain scarce. Centered on self-determination theory, the present cross-sectional study aims to identify gender differences and predictors affecting motivation, psychological needs satisfaction (PNS), and academic achievement during PE online learning. Data were collected from Saudi students' (N = 308, 161 females and 147 males) responses to the PE autonomy, relatedness, competence, and motivation questionnaires. Welch's t-test for unequal sample sizes, multiple linear regression, and binary logistic regression were used to compare means and to predict the relationships between the independent and dependent variables. The results showed higher autonomy and competence perceptions in female than in male students, but no differences were observed in relatedness. Female students presented higher intrinsic motivations, lower amotivation perceptions than males. However, no gender differences were recorded in extrinsic motivation. Students with less experience in online learning and weak grade point averages (GPAs) are more susceptible to having a high level of amotivation. Gender, GPA, and prior experience with online learning are the common predictors for all PNS and amotivation, while GPA and prior experience with online learning are the determinants of intrinsic motivation. GPA is affected by prior experience with online learning, autonomy, competence, intrinsic motivation, and amotivation. Therefore, teachers are encouraged to adapt their didactic-pedagogical behaviors during PE online learning according to students' motivation and autonomy perceptions. Structuring teaching activities with more individualized support for autonomy, competence, intrinsic motivation, and students' online skills/competencies ensures better learning efficiency and academic achievements.

Indexed as

Academic SuccessEducation, DistanceCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMotivationPersonal AutonomyPersonal SatisfactionPhysical Education and TrainingSaudi ArabiaSex FactorsStudents

Identifiers

PMID38319952
PMCPMC10846739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.