ArticlePloS one2024
Impact of interstitial lung disease on left ventricular myocardial function.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease-A Potential Treatable Trait.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2026Article
- Invasive Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Identifies Distinctive Hemodynamic Phenotypes in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease and Exercise Intolerance.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterstitial lung disease (ILD) comprises a wide variety of pulmonary parenchymal disorders within which progressive fibrosing ILD (PF-ILD) constitutes a phenotypic subset. By use of speckle tracking-based strain analysis we aimed to evaluate the degree of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in progressive vs. non-progressive fibrosing ILD (non-PF-ILD).
methodsA total of 99 ILD patients (mean age 63.7 ± 13.5 years, 37.4% female), composed of 50 PF-ILD and 49 non-PF-ILD patients, and 33 controls were prospectively enrolled and underwent conventional and speckle tracking echocardiography. Additional laboratory and pulmonary function testing, as well as six-minute walk test were performed.
resultsAs compared to the non-PF-ILD cohort, PF-ILD patients exhibited a significantly impaired forced vital capacity (2.4 ± 1.0l vs. 3.1 ± 0.9l, p = 0.002), diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO, 25.6 ± 16.3% predicted vs. 43.6 ± 16.67% predicted, p <0.001) and exercise capacity response as measured by the six-minute walk test distance (268.1 ± 178.2m vs. 432.6 ± 94.2m, p <0.001). Contrary to conventional echocardiographic LV parameters, both regional and global longitudinal LV strain measurements were significantly altered in ILD patients as compared to controls. No differences in LV strain were found between both patient groups. Significant correlations were observed between global longitudinal strain, on the one hand, and systemic inflammation markers, total lung capacity (TLC) and DLCO, on the other hand (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein: Pearson´s r = -0.30, p< 0.001; interleukin-6: Pearson´s r = -0.26, p = 0.007; TLC % predicted: Pearson´s r = 0.22, p = 0.02; DLCO % predicted: Pearson´s r = 0.21, p = 0.02).
conclusionsILD is accompanied by LV dysfunction. LV functionality inversely correlates with the severity of the restrictive ventilatory defect and inflammation marker levels. These observations support the assumption of persistent low-grade systemic inflammation that may link systemic cardiovascular function to ILD status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.