ArticleAging2024
Prognostic value and immune landscapes of anoikis-associated lncRNAs in lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMethods for predicting the outcome of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) in the clinic are limited. Anoikis is an important route to programmed cell death in LUAD, and the prognostic value of a model constructed with anoikis-related lncRNAs (ARlncRNAs) in LUAD is unclear.
methodsTranscriptome and basic information for LUAD patients was obtained from the Cancer Genome Atlas. Coexpression and Cox regression analyses were utilized to identify prognostically significant ARlncRNAs and construct a prognostic signature. Furthermore, the signature was combined with clinical characteristics to create a nomogram. Finally, we performed principal component, enrichment, tumor mutation burden (TMB), tumor microenvironment (TME) and drug sensitivity analyses to evaluate the basic research and clinical merit of the signature.
resultsThe prognostic signature developed with eleven ARlncRNAs can accurately predict that high-risk group patients have a worse prognosis, as proven by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC: 0.718). Independent prognostic analyses indicated that the risk score is a significant independent prognostic element for LUAD (P<0.001). In the high-risk group, enrichment analysis demonstrated that glucose metabolism and DNA replication were the main enrichment pathways. TMB analysis indicated that the high-risk group had a high TMB (P<0.05). Drug sensitivity analyses can recognize drugs that are sensitive to different risk groups. Finally, 11 ARlncRNAs of this signature were verified by RT-qPCR analysis.
conclusionsA novel prognostic signature developed with 11 ARlncRNAs can accurately predict the OS of LUAD patients and offer clinical guidance value for immunotherapy and chemotherapy treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.