ArticleMedical physics2024
Article in Medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Practical deep learning solutions for prostate cancer segmentation and implementation in radiotherapy planning.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026Article
- Deep learning for automatic detection of prostatectomy in CT images of prostate cancer patients.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026Article
- Automated workflow for target volume propagation in online adaptive magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy for lung lesions using foundation models.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence in radiation treatment planning: a narrative review from automation to clinical decision support.Translational cancer research · 2026Review
- Large language models for bioinformatics.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for radiopharmaceutical and molecular imaging.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Review
- Core-Periphery Multi-Modality Feature Alignment for Zero-Shot Medical Image Analysis.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2025Article
- AI in Radiation Oncology: A Comprehensive Review of Current Applications and Future Directions.Cureus · 2025Review
- A Language Vision Model Approach for Automated Tumor Contouring in Radiation Oncology.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- C2FAU-Net: A Deep Learning Approach with Multi-scale Strategy for Automated Delineation of Organs-at-risk in Cervical Cancer High-dose Rate Brachytherapy.Journal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEfficient and accurate delineation of organs at risk (OARs) is a critical procedure for treatment planning and dose evaluation. Deep learning-based auto-segmentation of OARs has shown promising results and is increasingly being used in radiation therapy. However, existing deep learning-based auto-segmentation approaches face two challenges in clinical practice: generalizability and human-AI interaction. A generalizable and promptable auto-segmentation model, which segments OARs of multiple disease sites simultaneously and supports on-the-fly human-AI interaction, can significantly enhance the efficiency of radiation therapy treatment planning. PURPOSE: Meta's segment anything model (SAM) was proposed as a generalizable and promptable model for next-generation natural image segmentation. We further evaluated the performance of SAM in radiotherapy segmentation.
methodsComputed tomography (CT) images of clinical cases from four disease sites at our institute were collected: prostate, lung, gastrointestinal, and head & neck. For each case, we selected the OARs important in radiotherapy treatment planning. We then compared both the Dice coefficients and Jaccard indices derived from three distinct methods: manual delineation (ground truth), automatic segmentation using SAM's 'segment anything' mode, and automatic segmentation using SAM's 'box prompt' mode that implements manual interaction via live prompts during segmentation.
resultsOur results indicate that SAM's segment anything mode can achieve clinically acceptable segmentation results in most OARs with Dice scores higher than 0.7. SAM's box prompt mode further improves Dice scores by 0.1∼0.5. Similar results were observed for Jaccard indices. The results show that SAM performs better for prostate and lung, but worse for gastrointestinal and head & neck. When considering the size of organs and the distinctiveness of their boundaries, SAM shows better performance for large organs with distinct boundaries, such as lung and liver, and worse for smaller organs with less distinct boundaries, like parotid and cochlea.
conclusionsOur results demonstrate SAM's robust generalizability with consistent accuracy in automatic segmentation for radiotherapy. Furthermore, the advanced box-prompt method enables the users to augment auto-segmentation interactively and dynamically, leading to patient-specific auto-segmentation in radiation therapy. SAM's generalizability across different disease sites and different modalities makes it feasible to develop a generic auto-segmentation model in radiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.