ArticleJAMA network open2024
Prothrombin Complex Concentrate vs Conservative Management in ICH Associated With Direct Oral Anticoagulants.
Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect on Mortality of Anticoagulant Reversal in Acute Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Anticoagulation associated intracerebral haemorrhage trends, treatment and outcomes in a metropolitan cohort: analysed by availability of specific versus non-specific reversal agents.BMJ neurology open · 2026Article
- Specific reversal agents for direct oral anticoagulants in neurosurgical emergencies - a systematic review.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Review
- Multidisciplinary Expert Guidance for the Management of Severe Bleeding on Oral Anticoagulation: An Algorithm for Practicing Clinicians.Thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Review
- Reversal of anticoagulation in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage related to oral anticoagulants: State of the evidence.European stroke journal · 2025Review
- Article
- Management of factor Xa inhibitor-related traumatic non-intracranial bleeding events with andexanet alfa or four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate in a US multicenter observational study.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024Article
- Reply to "Letter to Dobesh et al. on lower mortality with andexanet alfa in factor Xa inhibitor-related major bleeding".Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024Article
- Error in Table.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Andexanet alfa for the management of severe bleeding: what should critical care physicians know about it?Critical care science · 2024Article
- Specific Reversal Agents for Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Acute Stroke.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisReview
- Expert Opinion on Implementing Oral Anticoagulation Reversal Protocols in US Hospitals.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisReview
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedError in Table.2024
Authors and funding
20 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) associated with direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use carries extremely high morbidity and mortality. The clinical effectiveness of hemostatic therapy is unclear. Objective: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of DOAC-associated ICH treated with prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) vs conservative management. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this population-based, propensity score-weighted retrospective cohort study, patients who developed DOAC-associated ICH from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2021, in Hong Kong were identified. The outcomes of patients who received 25 to 50 IU/kg PCC with those who received no hemostatic agents were compared. Data were analyzed from May 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was modified Rankin scale of 0 to 3 or returning to baseline functional status at 3 months. Secondary outcomes were mortality at 90 days, in-hospital mortality, and hematoma expansion. Weighted logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association of PCC with study outcomes. In unweighted logistic regression models, factors associated with good neurological outcome and hematoma expansion in DOAC-associated ICH were identified. Results: A total of 232 patients with DOAC-associated ICH, with a mean (SD) age of 77.2 (9.3) years and 101 (44%) female patients, were included. Among these, 116 (50%) received conservative treatment and 102 (44%) received PCC. Overall, 74 patients (31%) patients had good neurological recovery and 92 (39%) died within 90 days. Median (IQR) baseline hematoma volume was 21.7 mL (3.6-66.1 mL). Compared with conservative management, PCC was not associated with improved neurological recovery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.33-1.16; P = .14), mortality at 90 days (aOR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.70-1.53; P = .88), in-hospital mortality (aOR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.69-1.79; P = .66), or reduced hematoma expansion (aOR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.38-2.31; P = .90). Higher baseline hematoma volume, lower Glasgow coma scale, and intraventricular hemorrhage were associated with lower odds of good neurological outcome but not hematoma expansion. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, Chinese patients with DOAC-associated ICH had large baseline hematoma volumes and high rates of mortality and functional disability. PCC treatment was not associated with improved functional outcome, hematoma expansion, or mortality. Further studies on novel hemostatic agents as well as neurosurgical and adjunctive medical therapies are needed to identify the best management algorithm for DOAC-associated ICH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.