Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38319606›Full record

ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2024

Anesthetic options for Rezūm water vapor therapy Is minimal sedation tolerable for a minimally invasive procedure?

Dhiraj S Bal, Matthew Urichuk, Kapilan Panchendrabose, Ryan Ramjiawan, Jainik Shah, Naomi Gebru, Alagarsamy Pandian, Premal Patel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Efficacy of Rezūm water vapor therapy for the treatment of catheter-dependent urinary retention A single-center, Canadian experience.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dhiraj S BalMax Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Matthew UrichukMax Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Kapilan PanchendraboseMax Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Ryan RamjiawanDepartment of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Jainik ShahMax Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Naomi GebruDepartment of Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Alagarsamy PandianDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Premal PatelDepartment of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere has been a rapid expansion of the armamentarium for managing benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Due to the invasiveness and complication risks of traditional surgical management, minimally invasive procedures have emerged. Rezūm water vapor therapy is a safe, effective alternative. Given the minimally invasive nature, there is interest in administering conscious sedation over general anesthesia to decrease procedural times and costs and increase accessibility by completing procedures in an office-based setting. We sought to assess and describe patient-reported tolerability for Rezūm completed under oral and deep intravenous sedation.

methodsPatients who underwent Rezūm between April and November of 2022 under conscious sedation with oral sedation and local anesthesia (OSLA) or deep intravenous sedation (DIS) were enrolled. Baseline information was collected, and followup interviews were conducted where patient tolerability scores, future anesthetic preferences, and complication data was prospectively obtained.

resultsFourteen patients were enrolled in each group. The OSLA and DIS cohorts had a median tolerability score of 8 (interquartile range [IQR] 3.5) and 9 (IQR 1.75), respectively, indicating highly tolerable experiences. There was no significant difference between groups (p=0.13). On followup, 85.7% of patients in the OSLA and 100% in DIS groups expressed their future preference for conscious sedation over general anesthetic, with no significant difference between the two groups (p=0.46).

conclusionsOur study demonstrates OSLA and DIS are both viable conscious sedation methods for Rezūm, with patients reporting high tolerability to the procedure regardless of sedation choice. Almost all patients receiving conscious sedation would choose to undergo Rezūm using conscious sedation again and had minimal complications.

Identifiers

PMID38319606
PMCPMC11152594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.