Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38319555›Full record

ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2024

Local administration of irinotecan using an implantable drug delivery device stops high-grade glioma tumor recurrence in a glioblastoma tumor model.

Dina Abdelnabi, Sarah Lastakchi, Colin Watts, Hannah Atkins, Shawn Hingtgen, Alain Valdivia, Christopher McConville

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Nanotherapy of Glioblastoma-Where Hope Grows.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dina AbdelnabiSchool of Pharmacy, Robert Aitken Institute for Clinical Research, Institute of Clinical Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT, UK.
Sarah LastakchiSchool of Pharmacy, Robert Aitken Institute for Clinical Research, Institute of Clinical Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT, UK.
Colin WattsDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Hannah AtkinsDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Shawn HingtgenDivision of Molecular Pharmaceutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Alain ValdiviaDivision of Molecular Pharmaceutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Christopher McConvilleSchool of Pharmacy, Robert Aitken Institute for Clinical Research, Institute of Clinical Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT, UK. c.mcconville.2@bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0750-9080

Funding

Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment for Glioblastoma is limited due to the presence of the blood brain barrier, which restricts the entry of chemotherapeutic drugs into the brain. Local delivery into the tumor resection margin has the potential to improve efficacy of chemotherapy. We developed a safe and clinically translatable irinotecan implant for local delivery to increase its efficacy while minimizing systemic side effects. Irinotecan-loaded implants were manufactured using hot melt extrusion, gamma sterilized at 25 kGy, and characterized for their irinotecan content, release, and drug diffusion. Their therapeutic efficacy was evaluated in a patient-derived xenograft mouse resection model of glioblastoma. Their safety and translatability were evaluated using histological analysis of brain tissue and serum chemistry analysis. Implants containing 30% and 40% w/w irinotecan were manufactured without plasticizer. The 30% and 40% implants showed moderate local toxicity up to 2- and 6-day post-implantation. Histopathology of the implantation site showed signs of necrosis at days 45 and 14 for the 30% and 40% implants. Hematological analysis and clinical chemistry showed no signs of serious systemic toxicity for either implant. The 30% implants had an 80% survival at day 148, with no sign of tumor recurrence. Gamma sterilization and 12-month storage had no impact on the integrity of the 30% implants. This study demonstrates that the 30% implants are a promising novel treatment for glioblastoma that could be quickly translated into the clinic.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaIrinotecanNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicDrug Delivery SystemsDrug ImplantsDrug LiberationFemaleHumansMiceMice, NudeXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicDrug ImplantsIrinotecanGlioblastomaImplantable deviceIrinotecanLocal drug delivery

Identifiers

PMID38319555
PMCPMC11445345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.