Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38319489›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2025

Development of an ultra-short measure of eight domains of health-related quality of life for research and clinical care: the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system® PROMIS®-16 profile.

Maria Orlando Edelen, Chengbo Zeng, Ron D Hays, Anthony Rodriguez, Janel Hanmer, Judy Baumhauer, David Cella, Bryce B Reeve, Patricia M Herman

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06980103 (Use of a Decision Aid to Resolve Uncertainty About Radioactive Iodine Treatment in Patients With Intermediate Risk Thyroid Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06980103 narecruitingnot on this map

Use of a Decision Aid to Resolve Uncertainty About Radioactive Iodine Treatment in Patients With Intermediate Risk Thyroid Cancer: The Radiance Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeorgetown UniversityRan2025 to 2029Enrolled408ConditionsThyroid CancerArmsDecision Aid, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A direct comparison of the measurement properties of the PROMIS-16 and EQ-5D-5L in the U.S. general population.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  3. Putting CATs and item banks to work: How to construct predictive and sensitive PROMIS screeners for use in ambulatory oncology.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  4. Cutaneous melanoma.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  5. Agreement of PROMIS Preference (PROPr) scores generated from the PROMIS-29 + 2 and the PROMIS-16.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  6. Comparing patient-reported outcomes measurement information systemQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  7. The PROMIS-16 reproduces the PROMIS-29 physical and mental health summary scores accurately in a probability-based internet panel.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  8. Longitudinal validation of the PROMIS-16 in a sample of adults in the United States with back pain.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  9. Enhancing Measurement Precision of Patient-Reported Outcomes Using Item Response Theory.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maria Orlando EdelenPatient Reported Outcomes, Value and Experience (PROVE) Center, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. medelen@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1381-1465
Chengbo ZengPatient Reported Outcomes, Value and Experience (PROVE) Center, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Ron D HaysDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, UCLA Department of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Anthony RodriguezRAND Corporation, Behavioral and Policy Sciences, 20 Park Plaza #920, Boston, MA, USA.
Janel HanmerDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Judy BaumhauerSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
David CellaFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Bryce B ReeveDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Patricia M HermanBehavioral and Policy Sciences, RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA, USA.

Funding

Measuring Chronic Pain ImpactR01AT010402 · NCCIH · RAND CORPORATION · PI HAYS, RONALD DALE, HERMAN, PATRICIA M · 2020 to 2023
$2.5M
NCCIH NIH HHS 3R01AT010402-03S1NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT010402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe describe development of a short health-related quality of life measure, the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system® (PROMIS®)-16 Profile, which generates domain-specific scores for physical function, ability to participate in social roles and activities, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, pain interference, cognitive function, and fatigue.

methodsAn empirical evaluation of 50 candidate PROMIS items and item pairs was conducted using data from a sample of 5775 respondents from Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk). Results and item response theory information curves for a subset of item pairs were presented and discussed in a stakeholder meeting to narrow the candidate item sets. A survey of the stakeholders and 124 MTurk adults was conducted to solicit preferences among remaining candidate items and finalize the measure.

resultsEmpirical evaluation showed minimal differences in basic descriptive statistics (e.g., means, correlations) and associations with the PROMIS-29 + 2 Profile, thus item pairs were further considered primarily based on item properties and content. Stakeholders discussed and identified subsets of candidate item pairs for six domains, and final item pairs were agreed upon for two domains. Final items were selected based on stakeholder and MTurk-respondent preferences. The PROMIS-16 profile generates eight domain scores with strong psychometric properties.

conclusionThe PROMIS-16 Profile provides an attractive brief measure of eight distinct domains of health-related quality of life, representing an ideal screening tool for clinical care, which can help clinicians quickly identify distinct areas of concern that may require further assessment and follow-up. Further research is needed to confirm and extend these findings.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesClinical screeningHealth-related quality of lifePROMIS profileShort-form development

Identifiers

PMID38319489
PMCPMC11800902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.