Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38319368›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

The role of preoperative MRI in endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal hypophysectomy of pituitary adenoma.

Muaid I Aziz Baban, Shkar N Omer, Abeer K Abbas AlZuhairy, Abbas A Mahmoud

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Muaid I Aziz BabanUnit of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Branch of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Sulaymaniyah Teaching Hospital, Sulaymaniyah, 46001, Kurdistan Region, Iraq. muaident@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4857-6557
Shkar N OmerUnit of Skull Base Surgery, Shar Teaching Hospital, Sulaymaniyah, 46001, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
Abeer K Abbas AlZuhairyUnit of Radiology, Department of Surgery, Branch of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Sulaymaniyah Teaching Hospital, Sulaymaniyah, 46001, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
Abbas A MahmoudUnit of Skull Base Surgery, Shar Teaching Hospital, Sulaymaniyah, 46001, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
University of Sulaimani · IQKurdistan Regional Government · IQ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe trans-sphenoidal approach, commonly used for removing pituitary adenomas, has become a widely accepted and successful method. In recent years, the endoscopic trans-sphenoidal technique has emerged as a minimally invasive surgical approach for pituitary adenoma removal. The majority of pituitary adenomas exhibit a soft consistency and can be successfully extracted with aspiration and curettage using the trans-sphenoidal approach. However, a subset of around 5-15% of these adenomas possess a solid and fibrous texture. The occurrence of firm and fibrous adenomas is relatively common; unfortunately, there are no reliable predictors to identify them preoperatively.

objectivesThe ability to forecast the reliability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) holds promise for improving prior preparation and impacts the extent of resection.

designA cross-sectional analysis of the investigation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in relation to cancer histology was performed on 68 patients who had endoscopic trans-nasal excision for nonfunctional adenomas. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe determination of an intensity ratio was performed by employing quantitative estimates of MRI signal intensity obtained from both the adenoma and pons. During the surgical procedure, a series of sequential-graded procedures were used for the removal of tumours with varying consistencies. Softer tumours were addressed using the Suction technique (R1), while tumours of intermediate consistency were treated using curettes (R2). In order to evaluate the fibrotic content of firmer tumours, the utilization of Cavitron Ultrasound Surgical Aspirator (CUSA), and/or other micro-instruments (R3) was employed, with the histologic collagen fraction being quantified. In order to investigate and analyse the data, a statistical analysis was conducted. A predictive relationship between resection category and both intensity ratio, and collagen percentage was noted. The primary objective of this study was to determine the appropriate cutoff criteria for clinical utilization, as well as to investigate the association between intensity ratios and collagen percentage.

resultsTumors with ratios ≤ 1.6 on the T2-weighted image and collagen content > 5.3% required more meticulous and sharp dissection for resection.

conclusionsThe utilization of MRI analysis may offer some assistance, but not conclusive, in the prediction of tumour consistency.

Indexed as

AdenomaPituitary NeoplasmsCollagenCross-Sectional StudiesHumansHypophysectomyMagnetic Resonance ImagingReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCollagenCollagen contentNonfunctional adenomaT2 FLAIR sequenceTumor consistency

Identifiers

PMID38319368
OpenAlexW4391577107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.